2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-016-9439-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Socioecological Approach to Relational Demography: How Relative Representation and Respectful Coworkers Affect Job Attitudes

Abstract: A Socioecological Approach 2 AbstractPurpose: This paper advances a socioecological perspective toward understanding the relationship between demography and job attitudes by considering the joint effects of individual ethnicity and ethnic group relative representation--the degree to which an individualÕs own demographic group is represented similarly in his or her organization and the community in which the organization is located.Design/methodology/approach: Hierarchical polynomial regression analyses of cens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in addition to increasing the proportion of underrepresented group members, it is also important to foster a climate of inclusion to achieve diversity goals (Mor Barak et al, 2016). Consistent with our model underlining the importance of high-quality relationships between senior leaders, respectful treatment among coworkers and a positive diversity climate have been identified as potential moderators of the effects of relational demography on employee work perceptions (Chattopadhyay et al, 2016;King et al, 2017). While our current theorizing focuses on the role of demographic and relational configurations of senior leaders in implementing diversity policies and increasing the numbers of underrepresented groups in organizational roles, diversity climate may also be an important factor to consider in future theorizing either as a contextual moderator or outcome of these processes.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Finally, in addition to increasing the proportion of underrepresented group members, it is also important to foster a climate of inclusion to achieve diversity goals (Mor Barak et al, 2016). Consistent with our model underlining the importance of high-quality relationships between senior leaders, respectful treatment among coworkers and a positive diversity climate have been identified as potential moderators of the effects of relational demography on employee work perceptions (Chattopadhyay et al, 2016;King et al, 2017). While our current theorizing focuses on the role of demographic and relational configurations of senior leaders in implementing diversity policies and increasing the numbers of underrepresented groups in organizational roles, diversity climate may also be an important factor to consider in future theorizing either as a contextual moderator or outcome of these processes.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This suggests that intellectual curiosity and preference for variety, for example, may not only enhance positive perceptions of job resources but also drive selection into better work environments. Although O*NET measures were designed to be independent of individual worker characteristics, these results indicate that ratings may be partly driven by selection into jobs that match individual characteristics of workers [64,79].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A practical implication of occupational sorting based on sociodemographic characteristics is that people who are like each other will find themselves in similar jobs. To exemplify, given geographic segregation, women who are K-12 teachers are likely to have other women as colleagues who share similar demographic and educational backgrounds [64]. Thus, their subjective perceptions of the resources available to them are likely to be similar to their peers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed with four statements: "The people I work with treat me with respect", "The people I work with seek my opinions", "I am trusted to do my job", and "I feel I belong to a team". This was previously used by King et al, (2017). Cronbach's alpha was 0.83.…”
Section: Individual-level Psychological Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%