1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)84183-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A software package for the orthogonal polynomial approximation of analytical signals, including a simulation program for chromatograms and spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Gaussian function 6-7 points are sufficient to describe it Calculates 7 points per peak for less than 0.1% error in peak area (uses Shannon's theorem) [18] 10 data points across 2.355 σ G Provides a "good guideline" for fast peaks [48] 8 data points across baseline width of a Gaussian 8σ G No criterion provided [52] 36 data points per peak Approximation derived from the inverse relationship between standard deviation of the Gaussian function and its Fourier transform [17] 14 data points per peak Analysis based on allowed maximum error (0.001%) in the peak height [14] sampling frequency = CQ√N 4V e 1 + k C= no. of data points desired per peak, Q= volumetric flow rate, N = plates, V o = void volume, k= retention factor [53] Real time oversampling (up to MHz) and data averaging Shows the advantage of oversampling points into one recorded data and averaging to improve the signal to noise ratio [19] 15 data points for a Gaussian peak 15 data points for < 0.1 % error in peak area; Simpson's rule: 6 x base width [15] Data acquisition rate has no influence on band broadening and resolution Also shows an example of "hidden features" in the software causing peak distortion [21]…”
Section: Suggestions For Practitioners and Manufacturersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Gaussian function 6-7 points are sufficient to describe it Calculates 7 points per peak for less than 0.1% error in peak area (uses Shannon's theorem) [18] 10 data points across 2.355 σ G Provides a "good guideline" for fast peaks [48] 8 data points across baseline width of a Gaussian 8σ G No criterion provided [52] 36 data points per peak Approximation derived from the inverse relationship between standard deviation of the Gaussian function and its Fourier transform [17] 14 data points per peak Analysis based on allowed maximum error (0.001%) in the peak height [14] sampling frequency = CQ√N 4V e 1 + k C= no. of data points desired per peak, Q= volumetric flow rate, N = plates, V o = void volume, k= retention factor [53] Real time oversampling (up to MHz) and data averaging Shows the advantage of oversampling points into one recorded data and averaging to improve the signal to noise ratio [19] 15 data points for a Gaussian peak 15 data points for < 0.1 % error in peak area; Simpson's rule: 6 x base width [15] Data acquisition rate has no influence on band broadening and resolution Also shows an example of "hidden features" in the software causing peak distortion [21]…”
Section: Suggestions For Practitioners and Manufacturersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that many of the suggestions differ because the focus of the investigations differed. For example the goal some workers was to accurately render peak heights [14] or while others considered peaks areas [15,16] and some focussed on the minimum number of points needed to describe a Gaussian function [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown [19] that a Gaussian function can be described if the distance between two sample points is equal to (or smaller than) the standard deviation o of the peak. If the width of an injection is small compared to the standard deviation, a width of one point (w = 1) will be sufficient, because then the distance between two sample points is smaller than the standard deviation of the peak.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stated simply, there must be enough IMS measurements taken to constitute a definable Gaussian peak eluting from the separation device. The reconstruction of an ideal Gaussian peak with an error of 0.1% requires a minimum sampling rate to establish seven data points across the peak’s full width at half-maximum (FWHM). , For a lower margin of error, more data points are required. As an exercise to illustrate the determination of the maximum measurement time for an IMS spectra, a peak elutes from a gas chromatogram with a minimum peak width (FWHM) of 7 s results in a minimum sampling rate of .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%