2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:sbej.0000022232.12761.a9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Spatial Interpretation of the Density Dependence Model in Industrial Demography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the aforementioned processes of legitimation, one would predict that the more firms in a particular industry are present in a region, the higher the regional entry rates in that industry (BIGELOW et al, 1997;VAN WISSEN, 2004). Put differently, one expects entry rates to rise with cluster size, where a cluster is defined here as a spatial concentration of firms in the same industry.…”
Section: Firm Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the aforementioned processes of legitimation, one would predict that the more firms in a particular industry are present in a region, the higher the regional entry rates in that industry (BIGELOW et al, 1997;VAN WISSEN, 2004). Put differently, one expects entry rates to rise with cluster size, where a cluster is defined here as a spatial concentration of firms in the same industry.…”
Section: Firm Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inverted U-shape relationship between density and founding rates means that founding rates increase at the beginning, and then decrease while density continue to increase (Ranger-Moore, BanazsakHollandHannan, 1991). The U-shape relationship between density and failure rates means that failure rates decrease at the beginning, and then increase while density continue to increase (Lazzeretti, 2006;Wissen, 2004). The assumed relationship between population density and founding and mortality rates is supported in studies conducted in many areas (for detailed information see Swaminathan, 1995, Silverman, Nickerson and Freeman, 1997, Hannanand Freeman, 1989Barnett and Carroll, 1987).…”
Section: Population Densitymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The second is competition, which has a negative relationship with the population size and firm founding. The social concept of legitimation includes the creation of a social structure in the environment of the firm, and has a number of clear similarities with the notion of the entrepreneur as a 'networker ' (van Wissen 2004). The concept of competition, although defined more broadly as competition for resources, comes close to the economic notion of competition.…”
Section: Firm Foundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carrying capacity is endogenous and changes as a result of inand decreases in the size of (local) business populations and consumers, who exert a (local) demand for products. More general, existing models of firm founding in organizational ecology and industrial organization primarily look at intersectoral and intertemporal differences, but disregard to a large extent the spatial variation, although this addition would be possible without problems (van Wissen 2004). Another important link between space and time in the development of business life is the product life cycle.…”
Section: Space-time Developments In Business Lifementioning
confidence: 99%