2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Spin–Photon Interface Using Charge-Tunable Quantum Dots Strongly Coupled to a Cavity

Abstract: Charged quantum dots containing an electron or hole spin are bright solid-state qubits suitable for quantum networks and distributed quantum computing. Incorporating such quantum dot spin into a photonic crystal cavity creates a strong spin-photon interface, in which the spin can control a photon by modulating the cavity reflection coefficient. However, previous demonstrations of such spin-photon interfaces have relied on quantum dots that are charged randomly by nearby impurities, leading to instability in th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has also been an enormous push for semiconductor spintronics during the past two decades [1][2][3][4] , with the aim to capitalize the past and current success of charge-based semiconductor technology and to make its spin counterpart the backbone of future spintronics, just like semiconductors have done in today's electronics/photonics. An exclusive advantage of semiconductor spintronics is its potential to interface with photonic devices that allows exchange of spin quantum information via photons, leading to opto-spintronic devices serving as spin-photon interfaces essential for inter-connects and data communications among and between classical and quantum information nodes and systems [10][11][12] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been an enormous push for semiconductor spintronics during the past two decades [1][2][3][4] , with the aim to capitalize the past and current success of charge-based semiconductor technology and to make its spin counterpart the backbone of future spintronics, just like semiconductors have done in today's electronics/photonics. An exclusive advantage of semiconductor spintronics is its potential to interface with photonic devices that allows exchange of spin quantum information via photons, leading to opto-spintronic devices serving as spin-photon interfaces essential for inter-connects and data communications among and between classical and quantum information nodes and systems [10][11][12] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, experimental demonstrations have shown that QDs are promising on-demand single-photon sources with high single-photon purity and indistinguishability [64][65][66]. Implementation of these gates through the use of other QD-cavity single-photon sources represents a promising route towards scalable, onchip quantum logic [67][68][69][70].…”
Section: Entanglement Swappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we fabricate bullseye antennas with nearly degenerate polarization modes to generate a large Purcell enhancement of quantum dots embedded in a charge tunable device, namely a p-i-n-i-n diode [31,32]. By leveraging the low charge noise associated with the diode, we measure spontaneous emission lifetimes of quantum dots as short as ≈ 80 ps (a Purcell enhancement of ≈ 15), which are close to the state-of-the-art optical lifetimes measured on quantum dots coupled to micropillars [3,4,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such partial etching improves the collection efficiency of photons scattered from the sample, it reduces the quality factor of the bullseye antenna [25], thereby providing a smaller Purcell enhancement compared to the ones observed by us after etching the sacrificial layer. The second factor that contributes to the enhanced optical emission rate is the deterministic charge capabilities provided by the p-i-n-in diode, which result in a reduction of the charge noise in the antenna's environment [31,32]. This low charge noise reduces the effects of spectral wandering of the antenna that may degrade the Purcell enhancement of the emission of the quantum dots coupled to it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%