2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.04.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stabilised nodal spectral element method for fully nonlinear water waves

Abstract: We present an arbitrary-order spectral element method for general-purpose simulation of non-overturning water waves, described by fully nonlinear potential theory. The method can be viewed as a high-order extension of the classical finite element method proposed and irregular dispersive wave propagation. The benefit of using a high-order -possibly adapted -spatial discretisation for accurate water wave propagation over long times and distances is particularly attractive for marine hydrodynamics applications.1

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(178 reference statements)
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several approaches can be considered to solve the Zakharov equations, such as the Hamiltonian Coupled-Mode Theory (or HCMT) method (Athanassoulis and Papoutsellis, 2017;Papoutsellis et al, 2018a), the extension of the high-order spectral (or HOS) method to variable bottom cases (Gouin et al, 2016), or the direct use of finite difference schemes (Bingham and Zhang, 2007). Other commonly applied approaches for solving the fully nonlinear potential flow problems are, for example, the Boundary Element Method (Longuet-Higgins and Cokelet, 1976;Dold and Peregrine, 1986;Grilli et al, 1989;Dold, 1992), the Finite Element Method (Wu and Eatock Taylor, 1994), the Quasi-Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian Finite Element Method (Ma and Yan, 2006), the Spectral Element Method (Engsig-Karup et al, 2016) and the Spectral Boundary Integral Method (Fructus et al, 2005;Wang and Ma, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches can be considered to solve the Zakharov equations, such as the Hamiltonian Coupled-Mode Theory (or HCMT) method (Athanassoulis and Papoutsellis, 2017;Papoutsellis et al, 2018a), the extension of the high-order spectral (or HOS) method to variable bottom cases (Gouin et al, 2016), or the direct use of finite difference schemes (Bingham and Zhang, 2007). Other commonly applied approaches for solving the fully nonlinear potential flow problems are, for example, the Boundary Element Method (Longuet-Higgins and Cokelet, 1976;Dold and Peregrine, 1986;Grilli et al, 1989;Dold, 1992), the Finite Element Method (Wu and Eatock Taylor, 1994), the Quasi-Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian Finite Element Method (Ma and Yan, 2006), the Spectral Element Method (Engsig-Karup et al, 2016) and the Spectral Boundary Integral Method (Fructus et al, 2005;Wang and Ma, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades or so, the NLPF formulation has been treated numerically by means of various direct numerical methods (DNM). Important examples are the finite difference method (FDM) [18] and the finite element method (FEM) [19], [20], [21], [22] [23], that require the construction of computational grids covering the entire fluid domain. Another popular strategy is the use of boundary element method (BEM), that transfers the computations on the physical boundaries of the fluid domain [24], [25], [26], [27], [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After solving for the velocity potential,w n+1 is obtained by a C 0 gradient recovery as w n+1 is needed to advance the free surface conditions another time step. Explicit time-stepping schemes are effective for FNPF as the time-step restriction is not dependent on the horizontal mesh size, but only on the vertical resolution and water depth, see [98]. A σ-transformed FNPF solver is well-suited for large-scale The use of σ-transformed domains excludes any truncated bodies in the domain.…”
Section: Fully Nonlinear Potential Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to handle arbitrarily shaped bodies in the domain the mixed-Eulerian-Lagrangian (MEL) approach should be used and there are ongoing efforts to implement a SEM based on the MEL approach. In [102] a work-around on the mesh asymmetry problem associated with the MEL was presented. By using hybrid meshes consisting of a single layer of vertically aligned quads (in 2D) at the free surface, the eigenvalues were shown to be purely imaginary for any triangulation of the inner field.…”
Section: Fully Nonlinear Potential Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%