2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2578-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stack fusion model for material removal rate prediction in chemical-mechanical planarization process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that the parameters of Σ X,X are θ, and Σ X,X is replaced by Σ θ , while the input data are considered to have completed normalization with a mean of 0, according to Equations (3)- (5), y conforms to a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 0 and a variance of Σ θ + σ 2 I. The probability distribution function of y is shown in Equation (6):…”
Section: Related Work 21 Deep Kernel Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that the parameters of Σ X,X are θ, and Σ X,X is replaced by Σ θ , while the input data are considered to have completed normalization with a mean of 0, according to Equations (3)- (5), y conforms to a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 0 and a variance of Σ θ + σ 2 I. The probability distribution function of y is shown in Equation (6):…”
Section: Related Work 21 Deep Kernel Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since individual machine learning models do not suitably fit the CMP process, some studies have used stacking models. Zhao and Huang performed one-hot encoding of the "stage" and "chamber" variables in the feature creation and feature encoding stages to transform the process data into multidimensional information, and the stacking integration model was chosen for the regression [5]. Li and Wu et al also used a stacking integrated learning regression model with primary learners including random forest (RF), gradient boosting tree (GBT), and extreme random tree (ERT), and meta-learner as extreme learning machine (ELM) and classification and regression tree (CART), and the features in the model included the frequency domain features of the three rotation variables and feature selection using RF [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting the removal rate and friction coefficient is essential for monitoring and automating the polishing process. Therefore, previous studies have focused on methods for predicting the removal rate based on neural networks, 23 the wafer-scale multi-physics model, 24 the stack fusion model, 25 and the reference-based virtual metrology method. 26 Other studies have considered the singlecorrelation between the friction coefficient and platen load current associated with the CMP of copper, cobalt, and STI (shallow trench isolation) 18 and CMP of tungsten and interlayer dielectrics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%