2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11273-020-09716-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A standardised approach to calculating floodplain tree condition to support environmental watering decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each tree was semipermanently labelled to facilitate repeat assessment. In situ tree crown condition was collected using TLM tree condition method (Souter et al, 2010), and data were interpreted as per Wallace, Gehrig, et al (2020). In brief, crown extent (CE), percentage of existing branches with live leaves and crown density (CD) and percentage of skylight blocked by live crown (Souter et al, 2010) were visually assessed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Each tree was semipermanently labelled to facilitate repeat assessment. In situ tree crown condition was collected using TLM tree condition method (Souter et al, 2010), and data were interpreted as per Wallace, Gehrig, et al (2020). In brief, crown extent (CE), percentage of existing branches with live leaves and crown density (CD) and percentage of skylight blocked by live crown (Souter et al, 2010) were visually assessed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, crown extent (CE), percentage of existing branches with live leaves and crown density (CD) and percentage of skylight blocked by live crown (Souter et al, 2010) were visually assessed. TCI was calculated by placing CE and CD data into categories ranging from 0 to 7 and CE and CD category scores to generate a TCI within a range of 0–14 (Wallace, Gehrig, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations