2015
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Standardized DNA Variant Scoring System for Pathogenicity Assessments in Mendelian Disorders

Abstract: We developed a rules‐based scoring system to classify DNA variants into five categories including pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of uncertain significance (VUS), likely benign, and benign. Over 16,500 pathogenicity assessments on 11,894 variants from 338 genes were analyzed for pathogenicity based on prediction tools, population frequency, co‐occurrence, segregation, and functional studies collected from internal and external sources. Scores were calculated by trained scientists using a quantitative fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognizing that some variants will have more complex requirements for classification, the Study Group recommends following the rules proposed by Richard and colleagues, which combine multiple criteria for classifying variants 63 . Variant classification requires the combination of several criteria, which are described in the following paragraphs 63,64 .…”
Section: Variant Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing that some variants will have more complex requirements for classification, the Study Group recommends following the rules proposed by Richard and colleagues, which combine multiple criteria for classifying variants 63 . Variant classification requires the combination of several criteria, which are described in the following paragraphs 63,64 .…”
Section: Variant Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertain significance category is a default classification for variants lacking sufficient evidence to determine their clinical significance [20••]. Some academic and commercial molecular diagnostic laboratories further subcategorize variants of uncertain significance (VUS) into “leaning pathogenic” or “leaning benign”, if supportive data exist but is insufficient to meet criteria for likely pathogenic or likely benign [30,31]. For example, a variant that segregates with disease in an affected relative and is absent from general population databases may warrant the variant to be classified as VUS “leaning pathogenic”, but is insufficient to classify it as likely pathogenic.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Variants For Mendelian Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Truncations of the protein at locations more distal to this residue have been classified previously as pathogenic (Tyr220*, Ser225*, Gln269* and others). The ZEB2 : p.(Tyr176*) variant was classified as pathogenic according to ACMG guidelines on the basis of being a null variant (PVS1), being de novo (PS2), and being absent in population databases (PM2) (Amendola et al, ; Karbassi et al, ; Nykamp et al, ; Richards et al, ). Pathogenic variants in ZEB2 are implicated in MWS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%