2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A state-of-art review on chatter and geometric errors in thin-wall machining processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 277 publications
(285 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the calculation of the SLDs of parts with low thickness as employed thin plates entails two phenomena. The first one is that the stiffness of the part is lower than the stiffness of the cutting tool, so chatter vibration is mostly affected by the dynamic properties and critical modes of the part [19]. The second phenomenon is the ratio of material removal, which is high compared to the global volume of the part and that leads to a continuous change in its modal parameters and FRF during machining [20].…”
Section: Vibration Monitoring Frf Obtention and Sld Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the calculation of the SLDs of parts with low thickness as employed thin plates entails two phenomena. The first one is that the stiffness of the part is lower than the stiffness of the cutting tool, so chatter vibration is mostly affected by the dynamic properties and critical modes of the part [19]. The second phenomenon is the ratio of material removal, which is high compared to the global volume of the part and that leads to a continuous change in its modal parameters and FRF during machining [20].…”
Section: Vibration Monitoring Frf Obtention and Sld Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improper clamping can seriously affect the final quality of the machined surface, especially the accuracy of the shape. This issue is particularly important when machining thin-walled components, as highlighted in the study by Wu et al [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of works have been completed to model the magnitudes of this deflection, but typically ranges from 0.01 mm to 0.3 mm in size [1][2][3]. Additionally, the low stiffness of the wall itself readily results in chatter regardless of tool stiffness [4,5]. Chatter leads to a poor surface finish on the machined wall and reduced tool life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%