2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11157-021-09608-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A state of the art review on the use of fungi in biofiltration to remove volatile hydrophobic pollutants

Abstract: The physical/chemical abatement of gas pollutants creates many technical problems, is costly and entails significant environmental impacts. Biological purification of off-gases is a cheap and ecologically safe way of neutralization of gas pollutants. Despite the recent advances, the main technological challenge nowadays is the purification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of hydrophobic character due to their low solubility in water. Among all known biological methods of air purification, the most cost-eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of biofilters as an alternative for odor abatement has been extensively reviewed in the past [84]; however, novel applications and opportunities are still arising [85]. Liu et al (2021) proposed recently a novel three-stage integrated biofilter combining an acidophilic bacterial-based section for S and N removal and fungal-based and heterotrophic bacteria-based sections for the treatment of organic odorants such as VOCs from MSW treatment facilities [86].…”
Section: Biofiltersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of biofilters as an alternative for odor abatement has been extensively reviewed in the past [84]; however, novel applications and opportunities are still arising [85]. Liu et al (2021) proposed recently a novel three-stage integrated biofilter combining an acidophilic bacterial-based section for S and N removal and fungal-based and heterotrophic bacteria-based sections for the treatment of organic odorants such as VOCs from MSW treatment facilities [86].…”
Section: Biofiltersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) Physiochemical tools within biosorption and mineralization of contaminants. Reprinted with permission under a Creative Commons CC BY License from . Copyright 2022, Springer Nature.…”
Section: Biofiltration Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marycz et al 67 proposed a biofiltration study on fungi to dismiss volatile hydrophobic contaminants. The removal of gas impurities in biofiltration results from an intricate blend of different biological and physicochemical spectacles (Figure 4(a)).…”
Section: Biofiltration Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of BFs is the difficulty in controlling the moisture content of their packing materials. BTFs allow better control of operational parameters such as biofilm thickness, pH, and subsequently the elimination of pollutants can be performed at higher VOC inlet loadings than with conventional BFs [44]. Contrary to BFs, BTFs do not require pre-humidification of inlet gas before its treatment; although, the humidification of inlet gases before entering BTF using humidifiers was performed in some studies [45,46].…”
Section: Biotrickling Filter Irrigation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungi can be more tolerant to dry conditions than bacteria and can be a suitable choice for VOC treatment in BTFs [44]. Zhang et al [53] studied toluene removal through BTF inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum.…”
Section: Biotrickling Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%