A state-of-the-art review on facilitating sustainable agriculture through green fertilizer technology adoption: Assessing farmers behavior

The Evolutionary Game Analysis of Multiple Stakeholders in the Low-Carbon Agricultural Innovation Diffusion

“…Furthermore, time and learning costs required to use new technologies also reduce the adoption of low-carbon technologies by farmers to a certain extent [8,9,32]. From the perspective of agricultural enterprises, due to the long cycle, high cost, and high risk of low-carbon technology innovation, the low-carbon innovation enthusiasm of agricultural enterprises is not high [11]. erefore, the development of low-carbon agricultural technology cannot be separated from the support of government policies [10].…”

“…Research and development, promotion, and application of low-carbon agricultural technologies are the key measures to achieve carbon sequestration and emission reduction in agricultural production [6]. In recent years, many countries have adopted policies to stimulate the innovation and diffusion of low-carbon agricultural technologies, such as subsidies, tax incentives, and public loans [7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, the diffusion of low-carbon agricultural technologies is still slow, especially in developing countries.…”

“…is situation is mainly due to the following two reasons. First, as demanders of low-carbon agricultural technologies, farmers are not enthusiastic about adopting low-carbon agricultural technologies affected by their knowledge level, income level, land size, and external environment [7][8][9][10][11]. Second, as providers of low-carbon agricultural means of production and technical services, agricultural enterprises are less motivated in low-carbon innovation due to the long cycle, high cost, and high-risk characteristics of low-carbon agricultural technology innovation [12].…”

“…Second, as providers of low-carbon agricultural means of production and technical services, agricultural enterprises are less motivated in low-carbon innovation due to the long cycle, high cost, and high-risk characteristics of low-carbon agricultural technology innovation [12]. erefore, the obstacles to lowcarbon agricultural technology innovation and technology promotion and the implementation effect of the government's low-carbon agricultural policy have attracted much attention [11][12][13][14][15].…”

Electric mobility in the Sicilian short food supply chain

“…A review of literature shows that the TPB has long been successfully used to investigate a wide variety of farmers' intentions such as: adoption of innovations and technologies (Adnan et al, 2019), sustainable practices (Zeweld et al, 2017;Menozzi et al, 2015;Fielding et al, 2008), adaptation to climate change (Arunrat et al, 2017; Dang et al, 2014), engagement in pro-environmental activities (Van Dijk et al, 2016). Despite the general usefulness of the TPB to identify and understand different behaviours of farmers, some scholars have attempted to enhance the predictive power of the TPB model, by including additional constructs Rezaei et al, (2018), who extend the TPB model by including the two constructs of moral norms and knowledge, have recognized an increased robustness and explanatory power of the proposed framework in predicting farmer's intentions towards engaging in farm food safety enhancements.…”