2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2010.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stationary point theorem characterizing metric completeness

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe give a stationary point theorem for some set-valued mappings on a metric space. The existence of fixed points of such mappings characterizes the metric completeness. Our result easily yields the order-theoretic Cantor theorem of Granas and Horvath, and the famous Ekeland variational principle.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An element x X is said to be an endpoint (invariant or stationary point) of F, if Fx = {x}. The investigation of the existence and uniqueness of endpoints of set-valued contraction maps in metric spaces have received much attention in recent years [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Endpoint Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An element x X is said to be an endpoint (invariant or stationary point) of F, if Fx = {x}. The investigation of the existence and uniqueness of endpoints of set-valued contraction maps in metric spaces have received much attention in recent years [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Endpoint Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A special fixed point for a multi-valued operator F : X → P(X) is the so-called strict fixed point or end-point for F. In this context, we have the following strict fixed point result for multi-valued Subrahmanyan contractions, which generalize one of the main theorem in [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In 2011, Jachymski [17] gave a stationary point theorem for some multimap on a metric space. The existence of fixed points of such maps characterizes the metric completeness and yields the order-theoretic Cantor theorem and the Ekeland variational principle.…”
Section: Tarski-kantorovitch Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. Recall that (i) is true by [17,Theorem 3]. Now Metatheorem with X = A works for x ̸ ≼ y instead of G(x, y).…”
Section: Tarski-kantorovitch Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation