1982
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(82)90440-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A statistical model to estimate long-term concentrations of pollutants associated with long-range transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The semiempirical, climatological model of Venkatram et al 52 has yielded results for wet deposition of sulfate and nitrate that agree suprisingly well with 1980 annual average observations at 34 sites in the U.S. and Canada. 62 The model calculation of wet deposition for 1980 conditions and 500. sources correlated with observations with a coefficient (R) of 0.87 for SO 4 = and 0.89 for nitrate.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The semiempirical, climatological model of Venkatram et al 52 has yielded results for wet deposition of sulfate and nitrate that agree suprisingly well with 1980 annual average observations at 34 sites in the U.S. and Canada. 62 The model calculation of wet deposition for 1980 conditions and 500. sources correlated with observations with a coefficient (R) of 0.87 for SO 4 = and 0.89 for nitrate.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…63 This evaluation focused on long-term averages. It showed that the Eulerian model of the evaluators 62 (RTM-LT) was superior to others examined: ENAMAP-2, a Lagrangian expanding puff calculation, and the MIT Model, 68 a climatologically based calculation similar to the OME model 52 when compared with ambient and sulfate data taken in 1977-1978. However, none of the models performed well for wet deposition of sulfate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 It provides for the longterm transport, dispersion, chemical transformation, deposition, and precipitation scavenging of SO 2 and sulfate. In this Appendix, the technical features of the model are reviewed, the model domain for this application is described, the choices of parameter values are explained, and a brief discussion of the relationship of sulfur chemistry to nitrogen and hydrocarbon chemistry is provided.…”
Section: Appendix: Description Of Model Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial models tended to be simple, using aggregated and parameterized meteorology and rate coefficients to simulate the physical/chemical processes responsible for regional transport. These included trajectory models (3,4), statistical models (5,6), as well simple diffusion and box models (7,8). As the understanding of the atmospheric processes increased, these types of models were generalized to include processes such as non-linear chemistry and atmospheric diffusion (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%