2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic nutrient-phytoplankton model with viral infection and Markov switching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, the work of May 36 pointed out that these small environmental fluctuations can affect the ecological parameters of a model positively or negatively, which can be described by white noise. Thus, following the idea of previous works, 26,27,30,31 the convenient formulations, which describe the intrinsic growth rates of phytoplankton populations and the death rate of zooplankton population that are influenced by white noise, are taken as r i → r i + 𝜎 i dB i (t)(i = 1, 2) and −d → −d + 𝜎 3 dB 3 (t), respectively. Here the terms dB i (t) denote the white noises and 𝜎 2 i > 0 are their intensities of white noises, i = 1, 2, 3.…”
Section: Model Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Actually, the work of May 36 pointed out that these small environmental fluctuations can affect the ecological parameters of a model positively or negatively, which can be described by white noise. Thus, following the idea of previous works, 26,27,30,31 the convenient formulations, which describe the intrinsic growth rates of phytoplankton populations and the death rate of zooplankton population that are influenced by white noise, are taken as r i → r i + 𝜎 i dB i (t)(i = 1, 2) and −d → −d + 𝜎 3 dB 3 (t), respectively. Here the terms dB i (t) denote the white noises and 𝜎 2 i > 0 are their intensities of white noises, i = 1, 2, 3.…”
Section: Model Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the work of May 36 pointed out that these small environmental fluctuations can affect the ecological parameters of a model positively or negatively, which can be described by white noise. Thus, following the idea of previous works, 26,27,30,31 the convenient formulations, which describe the intrinsic growth rates of phytoplankton populations and the death rate of zooplankton population that are influenced by white noise, are taken as ri→ri+σidBifalse(tfalse)false(i=1,2false)$$ {r}_i\to {r}_i+{\sigma}_id{B}_i(t)\left(i=1,2\right) $$ and −d→−d+σ3dB3false(tfalse)$$ -d\to -d+{\sigma}_3d{B}_3(t) $$, respectively. Here the terms dBifalse(tfalse)$$ d{B}_i(t) $$ denote the white noises and σi2>0$$ {\sigma}_i^2>0 $$ are their intensities of white noises, i=1,2,3$$ i=1,2,3 $$. We further consider the regime switching into the model, where the biomass of plankton often suffer switching abruptly to a contrasting alternative stable state in the real world due to some kinds of moderate environmental fluctuations, for example, environmental pollution, rain falls, 37,38 and biotic exploitation 39 .…”
Section: Model Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Species concentrations, however, are susceptible to fluctuations in the real environment that can not be neglected when seeking a better understanding of the dynamics of complex living systems [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. This is especially true for marine organisms due to the unpredictability of water temperature, nutrient availability, photosynthetically active radiation and other physical factors embedded in aquatic ecosystems [33][34][35][36]. Consequently, nonlinear stochastic ecosystem with noise term has recently attracted the attention of scholars [37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%