2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-010-0755-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic programming model for the optimal issuance of government bonds

Abstract: Sovereign states issue fixed and floating securities to fund their public debt. The value of such portfolios strongly depends on the fluctuations of the term structure of interest rates. This is a typical example of planning under uncertainty, where decisions have to be taken on the base of the key stochastic economic factors underneath the model.We propose a multistage stochastic programming model to select portfolios of bonds, where the aim of the decision maker is to minimize the cost of the decision proces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Balibek and K€ oksalan 2010Multi-objective stochastic programming Consiglio and Staino (2012) Stochastic programming Valladão, Veiga, and Veiga (2014) Stochastic programming Consiglio, Lotfi, and Zenios (2018) Linear programming Venture capital and initial public offerings Ko, Lin, and Yang (2011) Game theory Aouni, Colapinto, and Torre (2014) Fuzzy goal programming Bast i, Kuzey, and Delen (2015) Support vector machines Afful-Dadzie and Afful-Dadzie 2016Multicriteria analysis Quintana, Ch avez, Luque Baena, and Luna (2018) ANFIS, genetic optimization Tian, Xu, and Fujita (2018) Fuzzy systems Zhong, Liu, Zhong, and Xiong (2018) Bayesian inference, Markov Chain Monte Carlo Operational and liquidity risk modeling Chavez-Demoulin, Embrechts, and Ne slehov a 2006Extreme value theory Shevchenko (2009) Bayesian inference Aquaro et al 2010Bayesian networks Shevchenko 2011Bayesian inference Sanford and Moosa (2012) Bayesian networks Janabi, Hernandez, Berger, and Nguyen (2017) Copula modeling Eling and Jung (2018) Copula modeling Peña, Bonet, Lochmuller, Chiclana, and G ongora (2018) Adaptive fuzzy inference model Azar and Dolatabad 2019Fuzzy cognitive maps Derivatives and volatility modeling Bandi and Bertsimas (2014) Linear programming Quek, Pasquier, and Kumar (2007) Neural networks Liu, Cao, Ma, and Shen (2019) Wavelets Neural networks Kim and Won (2018) Deep learning Bezerra and Albuquerque (2017) Support vector machines Zeng and Klabjan (2019) Support vector machines Financial fraud detection Gaganis (2009) Multicriteria analysis, machine learning Dikmen and K€ uc¸€ ukkocao glu (2010) Integer programming Glancy and Yadav (2011) Text mining Abbasi, Albrecht, Vance, and Hansen 2012Stacked generalization Sahin, Bulkan, and Duman (2013) Decision trees Balla, Gaganis, Pasiouras, and Zopounidis (2014) Multicriteria analys...…”
Section: Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balibek and K€ oksalan 2010Multi-objective stochastic programming Consiglio and Staino (2012) Stochastic programming Valladão, Veiga, and Veiga (2014) Stochastic programming Consiglio, Lotfi, and Zenios (2018) Linear programming Venture capital and initial public offerings Ko, Lin, and Yang (2011) Game theory Aouni, Colapinto, and Torre (2014) Fuzzy goal programming Bast i, Kuzey, and Delen (2015) Support vector machines Afful-Dadzie and Afful-Dadzie 2016Multicriteria analysis Quintana, Ch avez, Luque Baena, and Luna (2018) ANFIS, genetic optimization Tian, Xu, and Fujita (2018) Fuzzy systems Zhong, Liu, Zhong, and Xiong (2018) Bayesian inference, Markov Chain Monte Carlo Operational and liquidity risk modeling Chavez-Demoulin, Embrechts, and Ne slehov a 2006Extreme value theory Shevchenko (2009) Bayesian inference Aquaro et al 2010Bayesian networks Shevchenko 2011Bayesian inference Sanford and Moosa (2012) Bayesian networks Janabi, Hernandez, Berger, and Nguyen (2017) Copula modeling Eling and Jung (2018) Copula modeling Peña, Bonet, Lochmuller, Chiclana, and G ongora (2018) Adaptive fuzzy inference model Azar and Dolatabad 2019Fuzzy cognitive maps Derivatives and volatility modeling Bandi and Bertsimas (2014) Linear programming Quek, Pasquier, and Kumar (2007) Neural networks Liu, Cao, Ma, and Shen (2019) Wavelets Neural networks Kim and Won (2018) Deep learning Bezerra and Albuquerque (2017) Support vector machines Zeng and Klabjan (2019) Support vector machines Financial fraud detection Gaganis (2009) Multicriteria analysis, machine learning Dikmen and K€ uc¸€ ukkocao glu (2010) Integer programming Glancy and Yadav (2011) Text mining Abbasi, Albrecht, Vance, and Hansen 2012Stacked generalization Sahin, Bulkan, and Duman (2013) Decision trees Balla, Gaganis, Pasiouras, and Zopounidis (2014) Multicriteria analys...…”
Section: Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study considers interest rates and equity returns as uncertain parameters, and uses no-arbitrage interest rate models and moment matching for scenario generation. Consiglio and Staino [7] propose a multistage stochastic programming model to select portfolios of bonds, minimizing the cost of the issuance of government bonds. Rocha and Kuhn [26] propose a multistage stochastic mean-variance optimization model for the management of a portfolio of electricity derivative contracts, whose role is to hedge the financial risk imposed by deregulation of electricity markets.…”
Section: Ardeshir Ahmadi and Hamed Davari-ardakanimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bolder and Rubin (2007) and Bolder and Deeley (2011) attempt to combine simulation and optimization approaches with the aim of approximating the debt management objective function through simulations by using function approximation algorithms and then to optimize this approximation. Balibek and Köksalan (2010) and Consiglio and Stanio (2010) suggest employment of stochastic programming models to formulate an issuance strategy. However, to the best of our knowledge, optimization models have not yet been put into practical use due to challenges with regard to their complex structure, which impedes interpretation and maintenance.…”
Section: Overview Of Debt Strategy Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%