2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1057-0810(02)00091-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stock selection model using Morningstar's style box

Abstract: In this paper, we place firms in the Morningstar's style box cells and test whether selecting ®rms from these cells allows investors to compile a portfolio consistent with their risk tolerance. We con®rm that the risk of those cells is consistent with the risk expectations published by Morningstar. Firms assigned to the upper left cells are lower risk than those assigned to the lower right cells. When we test for risk-adjusted returns we do not ®nd that investing in high risk cells results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is surprising that none of the style box dummies are significant, particularly given the strong emphasis placed on them by Morningstar and confirmation of their value in stock selection strategies provided by Schadler and Eakins (2001). Further, the model also shows that none of the grades given by Morningstar to categories of financial health, growth or profitability are significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is surprising that none of the style box dummies are significant, particularly given the strong emphasis placed on them by Morningstar and confirmation of their value in stock selection strategies provided by Schadler and Eakins (2001). Further, the model also shows that none of the grades given by Morningstar to categories of financial health, growth or profitability are significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Schadler and Eakins (2001) examined a stock selection model using Morningstar's style box. Basing on the Gordon model perspective and applying multiple criteria decision making (MCDM), Lee, Tzeng, Guan, Chien and Huang (2009) explore the influential factors and relative weight of dividend, discount rate, and dividend growth rate.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%