2009
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stomatal optimization theory to describe the effects of atmospheric CO2 on leaf photosynthesis and transpiration

Abstract: An analytical model for stomatal conductance is proposed based on: (a) Fickian mass transfer of CO2 and H2O through stomata; (b) a biochemical photosynthesis model that relates intercellular CO2 to net photosynthesis; and (c) a stomatal model based on optimization for maximizing carbon gains when water losses represent a cost. Comparisons between the optimization-based model and empirical relationships widely used in climate models were made using an extensive gas exchange dataset collected in a maturing pine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

16
360
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
16
360
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several innovative studies have applied optimization theory to model plant gas exchange (Lloyd and Farquhar, 1994;Buckley, 2008;Katul et al, 2010;Medlyn et al, 2011;Bonan et al, 2014), it has not been as widely adopted as might have been expected from such an elegant theory. Stomatal control of leaf gas exchange was formulated in terms of optimization theory almost four decades ago (Cowan and Farquhar, 1977), but stomatal control has been modeled predominantly using semiempirical or hybrid mechanisticempirical approaches (Damour et al, 2010).…”
Section: Modeling Stomatal Conductance At All Scales Is Underpinned Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although several innovative studies have applied optimization theory to model plant gas exchange (Lloyd and Farquhar, 1994;Buckley, 2008;Katul et al, 2010;Medlyn et al, 2011;Bonan et al, 2014), it has not been as widely adopted as might have been expected from such an elegant theory. Stomatal control of leaf gas exchange was formulated in terms of optimization theory almost four decades ago (Cowan and Farquhar, 1977), but stomatal control has been modeled predominantly using semiempirical or hybrid mechanisticempirical approaches (Damour et al, 2010).…”
Section: Modeling Stomatal Conductance At All Scales Is Underpinned Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An equation for g w can be obtained from this relationship with A expressed in terms of the Farquhar et al (1980b) photosynthesis model, but the form of the equation varies with the Rubisco and RuBP regeneration-limited rates of A (Arneth et al, 2002;Buckley et al, 2002;Katul et al, 2010;Medlyn et al, 2011;Vico et al, 2013;Buckley and Schymanski, 2014;Buckley et al, 2017). Although the utility of water-use efficiency optimization has been demonstrated in leaf gas-exchange studies, it has not been implemented directly in land surface models.…”
Section: Stomata In Global Models: Empirical and Optimization Approacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stomatal conductance may be independently reduced in the future by higher water use efficiency under elevated CO 2 , with relative reductions on the order of about ∼20% predicted by both modelling and experimental work [17][18][19] . Here, we report relative reductions in G S driven by rising VPD on the order of 10% in most forest ecosystems, which would imply even greater relative reductions in canopy stomatal conductance since G S is influenced by soil conductance, which is not sensitive to VPD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we report relative reductions in G S driven by rising VPD on the order of 10% in most forest ecosystems, which would imply even greater relative reductions in canopy stomatal conductance since G S is influenced by soil conductance, which is not sensitive to VPD. While VPD and CO 2 concentrations are assumed to be independent drivers of stomatal conductance in theoretical formulations 17,19 , the extent to which their effects on stomatal conductance are additive remains an important topic for future work, which must also consider the confounding effects of increasing leaf area index 29 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At shorter timescales, plants have the ability to adjust their phenotype to optimize gas exchange. In response to short (seconds to hours) perturbations in CO 2 , plants open and close their stomata (10,11), whereas in response to CO 2 changes at decadal to centennial timescales, plants adjust leaf stomatal density (D) and/or maximum stomatal dimensions (a max ) (12)(13)(14)(15). This process of epidermal structural adaptation is in part controlled by a signaling mechanism from mature to developing leaves, optimizing stomatal density and size to the changed environmental conditions (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%