2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-012-0424-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A straightforward conceptual approach for evaluating spatial conservation priorities under climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
48
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
48
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the stochasticity of the algorithm, we used the selection frequency metric (SF) [17] to compare the outcomes of our analysis. This measure represents the number of times each site is selected in the solutions to the overall problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the stochasticity of the algorithm, we used the selection frequency metric (SF) [17] to compare the outcomes of our analysis. This measure represents the number of times each site is selected in the solutions to the overall problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that we settle the lower limit rank to 90 following the literature [17], but this value is arbitrarily defined and, depending on the context, can be relaxed assuming other lower reference values (e.g., considering cells ranking higher than 50 as important, instead of higher than 90).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In parallel, some studies have focused on developing mitigation strategies, such as the selection of conservations areas for future climate scenarios (e.g. Loyola et al 2013) and international agreements for reducing greenhouse gases (for example, the Kyoto protocol).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models can be useful, as they generate a measure of climate suitability (in different climate scenarios) that can be used as a predictor of demographic (Tôrres et al, 2012), genetic (Diniz-Filho et al, 2009) and ecological variables . In addition, it may be useful to know the geographic distribution of a species for potential conservation purposes (Loyola et al, 2013), phylogeographic studies (Collevatti et al, 2013), as well as the impacts of global climate change on the geographic distribution of native species and of cultivated species (Nabout et al, 2012a). The niche models are referred to using various nomenclature, such as the ecological niche model, geographic distribution model, potential distribution model, habitat niche model, species distribution model , bioclimatic envelope models (Araújo and Peterson, 2012), habitat suitability model, niche-based modeling and climate envelope modeling (Lobo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%