2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00115.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A strain-rate-dependent force model of lithospheric strength

Abstract: Summary This study investigates the rate of intraplate deformation, the vertically integrated stress magnitude and vertical distributions of tectonic stress in continental lithosphere that is subjected to horizontal tectonic force. The fundamental assumption of this study is that the magnitude of the imposed tectonic force depends on the rate of deformation. This modification of the often applied strength envelope concept accounts for resistance forces generated externally to the lithospheric section that the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a more realistic model the lithospheric strength of Tien Shan for a given strain rate 10 −14 to 3 × 10 −15 s −1 was estimated as an integral of the limiting yield stress over the thickness of the whole lithosphere (∼140 km). The limiting yield stress was chosen as the minimum of the brittle strength rocks according to the Byerlee law, with a gradient of brittle strength of rocks of 110 MPa km −1 at depths above 4 km and with a depth gradient of 57.7 MPa km −1 plus a constant 210 MPa at depths below 4 km [ Stüwe , 2007]; the ductile stress was calculated from the dislocation creep [ Ranalli , 1987; Porth , 2000]. Brittle failure as a function of depth was taken for the case of a normal fault deformation where the maximum principal stress ( σ 1 ) is equal to the lithostatic stress ρgz , and the vertical stress is equal to the minor principal stress ( σ 3 ) [ Stüwe , 2007].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a more realistic model the lithospheric strength of Tien Shan for a given strain rate 10 −14 to 3 × 10 −15 s −1 was estimated as an integral of the limiting yield stress over the thickness of the whole lithosphere (∼140 km). The limiting yield stress was chosen as the minimum of the brittle strength rocks according to the Byerlee law, with a gradient of brittle strength of rocks of 110 MPa km −1 at depths above 4 km and with a depth gradient of 57.7 MPa km −1 plus a constant 210 MPa at depths below 4 km [ Stüwe , 2007]; the ductile stress was calculated from the dislocation creep [ Ranalli , 1987; Porth , 2000]. Brittle failure as a function of depth was taken for the case of a normal fault deformation where the maximum principal stress ( σ 1 ) is equal to the lithostatic stress ρgz , and the vertical stress is equal to the minor principal stress ( σ 3 ) [ Stüwe , 2007].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lithospheric strength or the magnitude of integrated differential stress F t beneath the south Tien Shan may vary from 7.9 to 4.0 × 10 12 N m −1 for the observed strain rates from 10 −14 to 3 × 10 −15 s −1 , which is close to the F t estimations of the compressional force near the Tibetan Plateau, 7 × 10 12 N m −1 [ Molnar and Lyon‐Caen , 1988]. In Tarim Basin this force is not enough to produce any lithospheric deformation because the lithospheric strength beneath Tarim Basin that corresponds to a heat flux of 45–50 mW m −2 is higher than 30 × 10 12 N m −1 [ Porth , 2000]. At the moment of the India collision with the Eurasian plate, the heat flux beneath Tien Shan was even larger, ∼80–85 mW m −2 (Figure 12), and the integrated lithosphere strength was less than 10 12 N m −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rutter & Brodie (1991), Meissner & Mooney (1998) and Porth (2000) discuss the validity and applicability of this equation. Rutter & Brodie (1991), Meissner & Mooney (1998) and Porth (2000) discuss the validity and applicability of this equation.…”
Section: O U N T a I N -P A R A L L E L C R E E P I N T H E L O W Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please note that we calculated the escape velocity twice: for the simple 2-D case (eq. Weertman 1970;Ranalli 2000;Porth 2000). (A4a) (last column) using average viscosity values of 10 21 and 10 22 Pa s according to Fig.…”
Section: A P P E N D I X a : To O T H P A S T E -T U B E E S C A P E mentioning
confidence: 99%