2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0091-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A strategic management approach for Korean public research institutes based on bibliometric investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To run the result analysis we shall commence from recognizing the system where the knowledge production is the activity capable of leading to new discoveries, bring its contribution to scientific progress and which influences the knowledge consumption regarded as the ability to assimilate and adjust new inventions [7]. We notice that the results of research activity are an important element in all phases of the management process.…”
Section: The Results Of the Scientific Research Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To run the result analysis we shall commence from recognizing the system where the knowledge production is the activity capable of leading to new discoveries, bring its contribution to scientific progress and which influences the knowledge consumption regarded as the ability to assimilate and adjust new inventions [7]. We notice that the results of research activity are an important element in all phases of the management process.…”
Section: The Results Of the Scientific Research Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is a growing need for an efficient implementation throughout public research institutions composed of multiple sub-organizations in order to deal with internal controls (Yang and Jung, 2014). For example, most public research institutions have undergone transformations in recent years due to modernization, imperatives for efficiency, and the promotion of collaboration with the industry (Buenstorf, 2009;Cohen et al, 2002;Simpson, 2004;Senker, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%