1997
DOI: 10.1086/285999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Structural Equation Model of Plant Species Richness and Its Application to a Coastal Wetland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
215
3
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
12
215
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been successfully used for modelling drivers of species richness in other species groups and habitats (Grace & Pugesek, 1997;Stevens, 2004). Its specific contribution is to provide a way to understand the individual contribution of each variable within complex systems and to evaluate the relative strengths of direct and indirect interactions among unmanipulated variables (Wootton, 1994;Shipley, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been successfully used for modelling drivers of species richness in other species groups and habitats (Grace & Pugesek, 1997;Stevens, 2004). Its specific contribution is to provide a way to understand the individual contribution of each variable within complex systems and to evaluate the relative strengths of direct and indirect interactions among unmanipulated variables (Wootton, 1994;Shipley, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct pathways represent the path model consistent with the data while indirect pathways between variables are those involving intermediary variables [30,31]. More introductory discussion and practical issues of SEM were described by Kubota et al [29], Gough et al [31] and Grace et al [30]. In conclusion, the use of SEM enables us to determine how Abies faxoniana regeneration is affected by forest gaps and elevation in a subalpine coniferous forest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Multiple regression analyses do not allow for the investigation of the direct and indirect effects of elevation, forest gaps, biotic factors and abiotic factors on regeneration; however, a structural equation model (SEM), which is also known as a path analysis, alleviates this problem. SEM is also an extension of the general linear model (GLM), which enables evaluating a network of dependence relationships through the analysis of covariance [29,30]. The general methodology of SEM enables the testing of a hypothesis that infers causation with observational data [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate our hypotheses, we constructed a conceptual model based on a priori knowledge (see below), which was tested against a dependence model using structural equation modeling (Grace & Pugesek 1997;Minden & Kleyer 2015;Peppler-Lisbach et al 2015). The model allowed us to identify direct and indirect interactions between environment, ecosystem, and services, and to quantify the explained variation of the final services as a measure of uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%