2022
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202201396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Structural Gel Composite Enabled Robust Underwater Mechanosensing Strategy with High Sensitivity

Abstract: One of the key challenges in developing gel‐based electronics is to achieve a robust sensing performance, by overcoming the intrinsic weaknesses such as unwanted swelling induced deformation, signal distortion caused by dehydration, and large hysteresis in sensing signal. In this work, a structural gel composite (SGC) approach is presented by encapsulating the conductive hydrogel/MXene with a lipid gel (Lipogel) layer through an in situ polymerization. The hydrophobic Lipogel coating fulfills the SGC with a un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To intuitively compare the GF values with those samples reported in the literature, the conventional method is piecewise fitting the ΔR/R 0 -ε curve. 37 A nonlinear segmental trend of ΔR/R 0 is summarized as three linear segments per strain range: a GF of 0.9 for 0%-200%, a GF of 1.6 for 200%-500%, and a GF of 2.6 for the strain range of 500%-1000%, which are comparable to the reported hydrogel sensors (1.053-1.51). 38 The ΔR/ R 0 values increase gradually with increasing the strain from 0.5 to 600% (Figure 6B,C), which suggests its high sensitivity and reliability for sensing at both tiny and large strains.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To intuitively compare the GF values with those samples reported in the literature, the conventional method is piecewise fitting the ΔR/R 0 -ε curve. 37 A nonlinear segmental trend of ΔR/R 0 is summarized as three linear segments per strain range: a GF of 0.9 for 0%-200%, a GF of 1.6 for 200%-500%, and a GF of 2.6 for the strain range of 500%-1000%, which are comparable to the reported hydrogel sensors (1.053-1.51). 38 The ΔR/ R 0 values increase gradually with increasing the strain from 0.5 to 600% (Figure 6B,C), which suggests its high sensitivity and reliability for sensing at both tiny and large strains.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The changes in resistance enhance sharply as mechanical strain increases (Figure 6A). To intuitively compare the GF values with those samples reported in the literature, the conventional method is piecewise fitting the ΔR/R 0 ‐ε curve 37 . A nonlinear segmental trend of ΔR/R 0 is summarized as three linear segments per strain range: a GF of 0.9 for 0%–200%, a GF of 1.6 for 200%–500%, and a GF of 2.6 for the strain range of 500%–1000%, which are comparable to the reported hydrogel sensors (1.053–1.51) 38 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ren et al have obtained a conductive hydrogel with excellent anti-swelling property by forming a double network that demonstrates electrostatic repulsion to water molecules . Wang et al prepared a hydrogel with a steady underwater sensing property by covering a hydrogel/MXene core with a Lipogel layer . Although the anti-swelling hydrogels reported in the literature were ingeniously designed, most of them were tedious to prepare and/or lack recyclability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Wang et al prepared a hydrogel with a steady underwater sensing property by covering a hydrogel/MXene core with a Lipogel layer. 23 Although the antiswelling hydrogels reported in the literature were ingeniously designed, most of them were tedious to prepare and/or lack recyclability. What's more, due to the fragility and nonrecyclability of the covalently cross-linked gels, their practical application may be limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we compared the sensitivities of wrist pulse monitoring of the HBT sensor with several recently reported MXene pressure sensors (Table S4). It can be seen that the HBT sensor delivers a sensitivity of Δ I / I 0 ≈ 7%, which exceeds that of most of the reported flexible MXene-based pressure sensors. ,, Additionally, the pressure sensor was employed to monitor the continuous body motions. As shown in Figure S16, when the sensor was installed onto a human finger, it could distinctly monitor finger bending, and the current response could further increase while continuously increasing the bending angles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%