Many linguistic forms are part of systems of linguistic choices that differ only in subtle cognitive-functional respects, which often concern their appropriateness in, and association with, particular situations. While such relationships have traditionally been described in terms of register, in a usage-based model such aspects have to be represented as part of their cognitive semantic description. However, situation is not objectively given but individually construed, and thus both inter-and intrapersonal variation can be found in speakers' linguistics choices; the key problem then becomes to identify the speakers' own cognitive models of the situation and to relate the occurrence of linguistic features to these models in order to tease out the subtle cognitive-functional aspects that distinguish the usage of the linguistic forms of a linguistic subsystem. In this paper I show the merits and limitations of quantitative and qualitative methods in the analysis of the role of situation in language use. I present a detailed study of grammatical mood in a corpus of human-robot interaction that provides an (objectively) identical situation for all speakers. In the corpus, mood choice can be shown to be significantly related to the speakers' different concepts of the humanrobot interaction situation, as well as to other linguistic features indicating differing cognitive representations of the artificial communication partner. I then propose a cognitive semantic analysis of grammatical mood, using Embodied Construction Grammar (ECG). This formalism has been designed specifically to account for the relationship between schematic, extralinguistic knowledge and grammatical choice (Chang et al. 2002).