2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2019.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, another line of research could be directed toward the development of a multi-stage stochastic framework to enable the revision of the planning decisions as more information regarding the uncertain data is revealed. Even though a multi-stage model yields a better characterization of the dynamic planning process, solution techniques remain computationally challenging (Bakker et al 2020). However, recent developments in stochastic nested decomposition techniques seem to be a promising venue for future research (Zou et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, another line of research could be directed toward the development of a multi-stage stochastic framework to enable the revision of the planning decisions as more information regarding the uncertain data is revealed. Even though a multi-stage model yields a better characterization of the dynamic planning process, solution techniques remain computationally challenging (Bakker et al 2020). However, recent developments in stochastic nested decomposition techniques seem to be a promising venue for future research (Zou et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible ways of addressing the dimensionality problem were proposed in the literature, such as approximate the future cost function by an analytical function rather than a set of discrete values 176 . More detailed explanations of the corresponded methodologies can be found in the recent review 177 …”
Section: Perspectives and Other Challenges In Formulation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomly as: Method 1: CC, VUF, VD with P-V2G (both system and customer objectives) [29,30] Method 2: CC, BC (only customer objective) [26][27][28] Method 3: VUF, VD with Q-V2G (only system objective) [31][32][33][34] All the results are only shown for bus 846 and in the 5 p.m.-10 a.m. time period, which represents the worst-case scenarios for this study. Tables 3 and 4 show the simulation parameters for the constraints and PSO used in this study, respectively.…”
Section: Case Study Under Different Ev Penetration Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%