2016
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0755-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of artificial eyes for the measurement of precision in eye-trackers

Abstract: The precision of an eye-tracker is critical to the correct identification of eye movements and their properties. To measure a system's precision, artificial eyes (AEs) are often used, to exclude eye movements influencing the measurements. A possible issue, however, is that it is virtually impossible to construct AEs with sufficient complexity to fully represent the human eye. To examine the consequences of this limitation, we tested currently used AEs from three manufacturers of eye-trackers and compared them … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
49
4
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, for each recording in each data set, we added a white Gaussian noise signal generated using the Box-Muller method (Thomas et al, 2007), separately for the horizontal and vertical gaze components. The choice to use white Gaussian noise to model measurement noise is motivated by recent findings that when recording from an artificial eye (which has no oculomotor noise), eye trackers generally produce white noise (Coey et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2016a). Both studies showed that the power spectrum is in this case constant and independent of frequency.…”
Section: Data Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, for each recording in each data set, we added a white Gaussian noise signal generated using the Box-Muller method (Thomas et al, 2007), separately for the horizontal and vertical gaze components. The choice to use white Gaussian noise to model measurement noise is motivated by recent findings that when recording from an artificial eye (which has no oculomotor noise), eye trackers generally produce white noise (Coey et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2016a). Both studies showed that the power spectrum is in this case constant and independent of frequency.…”
Section: Data Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In biological systems, the PSD is often inversely proportional to the frequency, and as such characterized by , where f is the frequency and α is a scaling exponent. Such scaling relationships have also been observed in human eye movements, with scaling exponents between –0.6 and –2 (Coey, Wallot, Richardson, & van Orden, 2012 ; Findlay, 1971 ; Wang, Mulvey, Pelz, & Holmqvist, 2016 ). The α value was determined by the slope of a straight line fitted to the PSD in log–log space.…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, their performance in detecting miniature fixational eye movements has been found to be comparable to that of the invasive search-coil technique, considered the gold standard in this field (McCamy et al, 2015). Compared with other commercial devices, including the dual-Purkinje-image eye tracker, the EyeLink device has been found to be among the highest in tracking precision (Wang, Mulvey, Pelz, & Holmqvist, 2016).…”
Section: Eye Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%