A study of costs and returns for rapeseed-mustard on the sample farms of Bharatpur district of Rajasthan

Dubey, Laxmi Rani; Pal, Harvindra; Singh, Samar

doi:10.5958/0976-0547.2014.01015.5

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While the net return obtained by the farmers from chickpea production in the state was Rs. 27,542.72 per hectare [16].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Comparative Economics of Chickpea: FPO in Banda District of Bundelkhand Region

Sudhir¹,

Kumar²,

Gupta³

et al. 2023

AJAEES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper critically examines economics of the members and non-members chickpea growers of the FPOs in the Banda District of Bundelkhand region. The study was designed to explore the feasibility of chickpea production in Banda district, which encompasses eight blocks i.e. Badokhar Khurd, Jaspura, Tindwari, Naraini, Mahuva, Baberu, Bisanda and Kamasin. Among these, Mahuwa block was selected purposively, because it had highest number of FPOs. In Mahuva block, out of eight FPOs, four FPOs were selected. From the selected FPOs, 60 members who cultivated chickpea of their farm were sampled. 60 respondents who were not a member of any FPOs were selected from 4 villages. Total sample size were 120 respondents. The profitability analysis indicates that the total cost of cultivation for FPOs members was lower (Rs. 34821.03) per hectare and non-members was higher (Rs. 36186.01) per hectare. The analysis of return indicates about the total net return of FPOs members was Rs. 27542.72 per hectare and cost of production was estimated Rs.2161.45 per qtl., while the total net return for the non-members was Rs. 12922.88 per hectare and cost of production was estimated Rs. 2631.70 per qtl. The benefit cost ratio (BCR) for FPOs members was 1:1.79 whereas non-members were 1:1.35. This indicates that the FPOs members spends less and earns more in comparison to non-members of chickpea growers in the study area.

show abstract

“…While the net return obtained by the farmers from chickpea production in the state was Rs. 27,542.72 per hectare [16].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Comparative Economics of Chickpea: FPO in Banda District of Bundelkhand Region

Sudhir¹,

Kumar²,

Gupta³

et al. 2023

AJAEES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is in line with the economic principle that scale can positively impact profitability by spreading fixed costs over a larger production as supports Dubey, L R. et.al. [15] study. The overall average return to cost ratio showed variation depending on farm size, indicating that the scale of production and cost management practices play a crucial role in the profitability of rapeseed-mustard cultivation.…”

Section: Fig 2 Compound Growth Rate (Cgr) Of Area Production and Prod...mentioning

confidence: 95%

Rapeseed-Mustard Farming in Begusarai, Bihar, India: A Holistic Exploration of Growth, Economic Viability, and Hindrances

Rathour,

Kumari,

Anil

2023

IJECC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study conducted a comprehensive analysis of the rapeseed-mustard sector's economic dynamics in India, with a focus on Bihar's Begusarai district. The study has been carried out with the objectives of analyzing the trend in area, production and productivity along with the cost and return from rapeseed-mustard production. Further the constraints faced by the famers were also documented and ranked. Primary data was collected from 120 rapeseed-mustard growers of District from a cluster of three villages each from two blocks through SRSWOR Technique and secondary data were collected from different published sources. A negative growth rate (CGR) in area (-0.05%) was observed while the growth in production and productivity of Rapeseed-Mustard during 1998-99 to 2018-19 in Bihar was positive and significant. Districts wise analysis in entire period together there was positive Growth in the area, production and productivity. The average cost of cultivation per hectare was ₹ 63,873.1, while the gross income stood at ₹ 83,746.92, yielding a favourable return-to-cost ratio of 1:1.39, implying that rapeseed–mustard fetched an additional return of 39 paisa on each rupee spent. Primary constraints identified included the absence of high-quality seed varieties and elevated transportation expenses, both warranting attentions. To bolster the future of rapeseed-mustard, widespread dissemination of advanced farming techniques and the establishment of processing facilities among smallholders is recommended.

show abstract

“…In Uttar Pradesh, a significant rise has been sighted in the last ten years of Mustard's area, production and yield, the production has almost become doubled" [3,4]. The present study has identified the measures of growth and instability (area, production and yield), of mustard in India, U.P and Jhansi district which would help policymakers and government for planning and implementing of policy related to its production and trade different oilseeds mustard is the second important oilseed crop of India, next to groundnut in respect of production [5,6]. Government of India and the Uttar Pradesh Govt.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimation of Cost and Returns per Hectare, and Input-Output Ratio of Mustard on Different Size Group of Farms in Jhansi District of Uttar Pradesh, India

Sai

Maurya

2023

JEAI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study was conducted in Jhansi District of Uttar Pradesh .. Acknowledging the limited time, money, resources and employment stability of Mustard .Totally 100 respondents were selected and interviewed. Primary data were collected through interview method, a number of different schedules were prepared for that purpose.For the collections of primary data, a number of different schedules were prepared for that purpose. The information was obtained from discussion with traders and farmers and actual spot observations. The information pertaining to production, purchases and disposal pattern of mustard was collected and secondary data were collected from government offices. Tabular and functional analyses were used to draw the conclusion, Respondents were categorized as marginal, small and medium size of farm. The cost and return have been summarized in this part of the result. On an overall average the major component of the cost were human labor (23.27 per cent), rental value of owned land 21.11 per cent),Accurate and region- specific data is important for obtaining respective and reliable estimates of the total costs of cultivation. It was observed that hired labour, machinery labour, seed, manure & fertilizer, irrigation showed constructive relationship with the increase in farm size, while family labour showed the inverse correlation (relationship) with increase the farm size. The objective is to estimate the cost and returns per ha of mustard cultivation.

show abstract

A study of costs and returns for rapeseed-mustard on the sample farms of Bharatpur district of Rajasthan

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Assessing the Comparative Economics of Chickpea: FPO in Banda District of Bundelkhand Region

Assessing the Comparative Economics of Chickpea: FPO in Banda District of Bundelkhand Region

Rapeseed-Mustard Farming in Begusarai, Bihar, India: A Holistic Exploration of Growth, Economic Viability, and Hindrances

Estimation of Cost and Returns per Hectare, and Input-Output Ratio of Mustard on Different Size Group of Farms in Jhansi District of Uttar Pradesh, India

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About