2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of glassy carbon electrodes modified with azobenzene derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
4
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At more negative potentials (~À0.9 V vs. SCE) a second peak is observed in accordance with previous studies [73,80]. Usually, the electrocatalytic activity for ORR is assigned to native quinone-type groups present on the bare GC surface [8,9].…”
Section: Determination Of Surface Concentration Of Aq Groups and Filmsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At more negative potentials (~À0.9 V vs. SCE) a second peak is observed in accordance with previous studies [73,80]. Usually, the electrocatalytic activity for ORR is assigned to native quinone-type groups present on the bare GC surface [8,9].…”
Section: Determination Of Surface Concentration Of Aq Groups and Filmsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For comparative reasons, the bare electrodes are also included in these studies. With GC itself it is well known that the interaction of ferricyanide ions enables a fast heterogeneous electron transfer (Figure 7 A) [68,[73][74][75], while the redox response of the Fe(CN) 6 3À/4À probe on basal plane HOPG is slower (Figure 7 B) [74,76] giving rise to a considerably larger peak-to-peak separation.…”
Section: Determination Of Surface Concentration Of Aq Groups and Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the ORR electrocatalytic activity of bare GC has been thoroughly studied, some similarities between graphene-based substrates and bare GC can be seen. Namely, according to the literature, bare GC exhibits also two reduction peaks (at about´0.4 and´0.9 V vs. SCE) in alkaline medium [41,[64][65][66], which is in accordance with this study (see Figure 5). The presence of two reduction peaks indicates that the ORR undergoes two processes, both attributed to the two-electron reduction of O 2 to HO 2´.…”
Section: Oxygen Reduction Reaction On Graphene-based Nanomaterialssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…0.1 mA¨cm´2) [70] was determined as ca.´0.2 V for GC/Graphene1, GC/Graphene2, GC/rGO and GC/GO electrodes. This value is higher than for example in case of bare GC (ca.´0.3 V [66]) indicating that the ORR process starts at a higher potential on all these materials than on bare GC, which is also consistent with the LSV results (see Figure 5).…”
Section: Oxygen Reduction Reaction On Graphene-based Nanomaterialssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For comparative reasons, the bare electrodes are also included in these studies. With GC itself it is well known that the interaction of ferricyanide ions enables a fast heterogeneous electron transfer (Figure 7 A) 68, 7375, while the redox response of the Fe(CN) 6 3−/4− probe on basal plane HOPG is slower (Figure 7 B) 74, 76 giving rise to a considerably larger peak‐to‐peak separation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%