2013
DOI: 10.5958/j.0976-5506.4.2.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Hypertension and its Sociodemographic Factors among Bus Conductors in North Karnataka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drivers and conductors working for more than 30 years had 22.67-and 11.02-times higher risk of having hypertension than those working for less than 10 years and one of the major factors explaining this association is the job stress which increases as the duration of service in the department increases, thus affecting the health of bus drivers and conductors. Similar findings were reported in other studies by Joshi et al 21 and Joshi et al 22 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Drivers and conductors working for more than 30 years had 22.67-and 11.02-times higher risk of having hypertension than those working for less than 10 years and one of the major factors explaining this association is the job stress which increases as the duration of service in the department increases, thus affecting the health of bus drivers and conductors. Similar findings were reported in other studies by Joshi et al 21 and Joshi et al 22 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…HTN in this study is in line with similar studies conducted in Karnataka, India, and Mojo terminal, which was 23.2% and 20%, respectively [38,39].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Socioeconomic status is found to be directly proportional to prevalence of hypertension in present study as reported by Joshi et al 13,22 , Tobin et al (2013) 23 in which higher the socioeconomic status, more was the prevalence of hypertension. However, Borle and Jadhao et al 21 reported negative association in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%