1998
DOI: 10.1080/0950069980200806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of Korean middle school students’ interests in biology and their implications for biology education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, significant differences in attitudes between students reporting biology as their favourite subject indicate that such simple categorisation can be used in further studies. Non-linear distribution of attitudes can be explained as the effect of a different curriculum in Girls' preferences for botany support earlier findings by Hong et al (1998), but we failed to find girls' preferences for human biology and boys' preferences for earth sciences (Dawson, 2000). Interestingly, while science is generally more difficult to understand for girls (Jones et al, 2000;Osborne et al, 2003) boys in our study reported that biology is significantly more difficult for them.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, significant differences in attitudes between students reporting biology as their favourite subject indicate that such simple categorisation can be used in further studies. Non-linear distribution of attitudes can be explained as the effect of a different curriculum in Girls' preferences for botany support earlier findings by Hong et al (1998), but we failed to find girls' preferences for human biology and boys' preferences for earth sciences (Dawson, 2000). Interestingly, while science is generally more difficult to understand for girls (Jones et al, 2000;Osborne et al, 2003) boys in our study reported that biology is significantly more difficult for them.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…As indicated by several researchers such as Hong, Shim & Chang (1998), Prokop, Prokop & Tunnicliffe (2007), and Trumper (2006), girls have a greater preference of studying about plants than boys. Therefore, it is not surprising that students who are used to merely receiving information tend to reject a more active approach.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Õpilaste huvi uurimisele on lähenetud kas ühe loodusaine spetsiifiliselt, nt füüsikas (Badri, Al Mazroui, Al Rashedi, & Yang, 2016;Häussler & Hoffmann, 2002;Reid & Skryabina, 2003;Trumper, 2006;Walper, Pollmeier, Lange, Kleickmann, & Möller, 2016), bioloogias (Baram-Tsarabi & Kaadni, 2009;Baram-Tsarabi, Sethi, Bry, & Yarden, 2010;Gardner & Tamir, 1989;Hagay et al, 2013;Hong, Shim, & Chang, 1998), keemias (Alebiosu, 2006) ja geograafias (earth science) (Betzner & Marek, 2014;Harp & Mayer, 1997), või loodusaineteüleselt (Dawson, 2000;Christidou, 2006;Lavonen et al, 2008;Teppo & Rannikmäe, 2008). Õpilaste teadmiste ja oskuste testimise kõrval on loodusainete õppimisega seotud huve ja hinnanguid vähemal määral uuritud ka rahvusvaheliste võrdlusuuringute, nagu TIMSSi ja PISA raames.…”
Section: Huvi Loodusteaduslike Teemade õPpimise Vastuunclassified