2020
DOI: 10.21427/g68y-2219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of Mazuism Religious Tourism in Taiwan: An Example of Dajia Jenn Lann Temple

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, they aid the insight of the relationship between place attachment, authentic experience, satisfaction, destination revisit intention, and WOM toward a religious place (i.e., Father Diep Church). While there is no reflection of these relationships in literature, our findings contradict earlier studies within a religious context, especially that pertaining to decision-making and revisit intention (Hsiao-Ming et al, 2020;Liao et al, 2021;Patwardhan et al, 2020;Rasoolimanesh et al, 2021), satisfaction (Liao et al, 2021;Wardi et al, 2018), traditional WOM (Casidy et al, 2021;Wardi et al, 2018), place attachment (Patwardhan et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2019), and having an authentic experience (Girish & Chen, 2017;Lee et al, 2020;Rasoolimanesh et al, 2021). The contribution of current study is to focus on literature via investigating the relationships among place attachment, authentic experience, satisfaction, destination revisit intention, and WOM for Father Diep Church, which has not been undertaken previously.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationscontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, they aid the insight of the relationship between place attachment, authentic experience, satisfaction, destination revisit intention, and WOM toward a religious place (i.e., Father Diep Church). While there is no reflection of these relationships in literature, our findings contradict earlier studies within a religious context, especially that pertaining to decision-making and revisit intention (Hsiao-Ming et al, 2020;Liao et al, 2021;Patwardhan et al, 2020;Rasoolimanesh et al, 2021), satisfaction (Liao et al, 2021;Wardi et al, 2018), traditional WOM (Casidy et al, 2021;Wardi et al, 2018), place attachment (Patwardhan et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2019), and having an authentic experience (Girish & Chen, 2017;Lee et al, 2020;Rasoolimanesh et al, 2021). The contribution of current study is to focus on literature via investigating the relationships among place attachment, authentic experience, satisfaction, destination revisit intention, and WOM for Father Diep Church, which has not been undertaken previously.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationscontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Tourist satisfaction is recognized as a significant indicator of revisit intention at the destination level (Cifci, 2021), which is in numerous prior research (Chen & Chen, 2010;Chi & Qu, 2008;Seetanah et al, 2020). Tourists incline to turn back to a place if they had a positive experience there (Hsiao-Ming et al, 2020;Liao et al, 2021). Hence, it is clear that the intention to revisit depends on tourist satisfaction (Shafiee et al, 2016) and satisfaction is correlated with intentions to revisit religious destinations (Liao et al, 2021;Nguyen-Viet & Nguyen Van, 2021;Rahman et al, 2022).…”
Section: Destination Revisit Intentionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations