1997
DOI: 10.1093/bja/78.4.436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of mixing conditions during nitric oxide administration using simultaneous fast response chemiluminescence and capnography

Abstract: We have evaluated the mixing properties of nitric oxide in inspired gases for five different administration techniques. Nitric oxide and carbon dioxide were delivered to the ventilator system before the ventilator or after the ventilator as a continuous flow, either directly into the inspiratory limb or into a mixing chamber positioned in the inspiratory limb. Both gases were delivered as above but synchronized with inspiration. Mixing conditions were evaluated using fast response chemiluminescence for nitric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…300-1000 ppm) accumulates during expiration at the injection site, creating a bolus which is transported and diluted along the respiratory system during inspiration. Therefore, it is not surprising that for CFS, very high peak NO meas exceeding NO target by factors of 2.4, 16 3.0 6 and 5.0 5 13 have been reported. This large variability between observed peak NO meas may be explained by different measurement technologies, such as fast-vs slow-response chemiluminescence 14 16 or by the use of a tracer gas such as nitrogen 6 or carbon dioxide 5 13 (instead of nitric oxide) which provide the advantage of rapid analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…300-1000 ppm) accumulates during expiration at the injection site, creating a bolus which is transported and diluted along the respiratory system during inspiration. Therefore, it is not surprising that for CFS, very high peak NO meas exceeding NO target by factors of 2.4, 16 3.0 6 and 5.0 5 13 have been reported. This large variability between observed peak NO meas may be explained by different measurement technologies, such as fast-vs slow-response chemiluminescence 14 16 or by the use of a tracer gas such as nitrogen 6 or carbon dioxide 5 13 (instead of nitric oxide) which provide the advantage of rapid analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The NO concentrations measured by the analyser are low compared with the calculated level. There are well documented problems of continuous flow infusion into an intermittent flow ventilator[10–14]. As the NO was infused continuously, it presumably is delivered in relatively concentrated ‘boluses’ with a peak and trough pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have attempted to determine the behaviour of NO and devise an optimal delivery system[8–10]. Although NO equipped ventilators are now available commercially, there is concern that commonly used delivery systems produce widely variable NO concentrations[10], particularly when combining continual infusion and intermittent flow ventilators[11–14]. These factors tend to produce a ‘bolus’ effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, NO can be delivered into the inspiratory limb of the ventilator to reduce the contact time between NO and O 2 [8,[17][18][19][20][21]. However, with these techniques there is considerable concern about fluctuations in inspired NO concentrations [22][23][24]. Our data suggest that NO 2 production within a ventilator circuit depends on three important variables: the delivered NO concentration, the inspired NO concentration and the residence time of NO within the circuit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%