1996
DOI: 10.1016/1359-6462(95)00496-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of physico-chemical mechanisms responsible for damage of heat treated and as-cast ferritic spheroïdal graphite cast irons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with EPMA analyses, SIMS allows getting better detection limit but with a lower spatial resolution (the graphite/matrix interface appears over a couple of microns on the profiles) and it remains a qualitative analysis. This increase in magnesium at the graphite/matrix interface has been already pointed out by Dierickx et al in heat-treated spheroidal graphite cast iron samples [9]. It reinforces the hypothesis of an action of some trace element on graphite growth by an adsorption and/or absorption at the graphite surface during its growth.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…In comparison with EPMA analyses, SIMS allows getting better detection limit but with a lower spatial resolution (the graphite/matrix interface appears over a couple of microns on the profiles) and it remains a qualitative analysis. This increase in magnesium at the graphite/matrix interface has been already pointed out by Dierickx et al in heat-treated spheroidal graphite cast iron samples [9]. It reinforces the hypothesis of an action of some trace element on graphite growth by an adsorption and/or absorption at the graphite surface during its growth.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…These values are macroscopically consistent in the sense that they allow recovering the global elastic properties of ductile iron according to common micromechanical homogenization procedures [14]. Furthermore, they are also in fairly 3 good agreement with nano-indentation tests [15] [16] performed according to the OliverPharr method [17]. Nevertheless, the validity of such measurements is quite disputable as graphite is highly anisotropic at the nanoscale, meaning that the concept of nanoindentation based Young's modulus loses its significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The values of the Young's modulus for different temperatures used here are given in Table 3 [51] and those of the thermal expansion coefficient in Table 4 [52]. 6 12.6 13.3 14.0 Table 4 Thermal expansion coefficient of pearlitic steel for different temperature ranges [52] T [ • C] 0-100 0-200 0-300 0-400 α [μm/m • C] 11.…”
Section: Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%