1977
DOI: 10.1080/00207547708943111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the relationship between remote thermocouple temperatures and tool wear in machining

Abstract: Experimental data. are presented which demonstrate a strong correlation between tool wear and the signal of a thermocouple located at a position on the cutting tool remote from the cutting edge. A mathematical model is proposed for explaining this relationship between tool wear and. temperature. The model is supported by good statistica.! agreement between the data and the form of the proposed equation. For Q total of nine different machining conditions with replications for several of the conditions, the corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither method is suitable for on-line tool wear measurement due to long processing times and potential hazards. Other direct methods use tool/work junction electrical resistance (Groover et al 1977), workpiece size changing (Koren et al 1991) and tool/work distance (Gamaye I and Bregger 1986) as the parameters to estimate tool wear in a turning process. However, Revision received December 1993.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither method is suitable for on-line tool wear measurement due to long processing times and potential hazards. Other direct methods use tool/work junction electrical resistance (Groover et al 1977), workpiece size changing (Koren et al 1991) and tool/work distance (Gamaye I and Bregger 1986) as the parameters to estimate tool wear in a turning process. However, Revision received December 1993.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrete-time form of the linear model is defined by equations (11) and (12). The transfer function of this model is defined by equation (13).…”
Section: Estimation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct methods include optical [2], wear particle [3], radioactivity [4], tool/work-piece junction electrical resistance [5], pneumatic [6] and tool/work-piece distance measurements [7,8]. Indirect methods include those measuring cutting force [9], acoustic emission [10,11] motor power/current [12], vibration [13], cutting temperature [14], roughness [15], damping index [16], friction coe$cient [17], either alone or in combination [18]. These studies deal exclusively with turning operations which use non-rotating single point tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%