1975
DOI: 10.21236/ada012678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of the Retention of Skills and Knowledge Acquired in Basic Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in an Army study of 13 basic training tasks (see Figure 9), high-aptitude soldiers out-performed lowaptitude soldiers both at the end of basic training and six weeks later; but the performance differences between the high and low aptitude soldiers on the six-week test were the same as at the end of basic training. 21 In a similar ARI study of knowledge and skill among radio operators 45 , although ASVAB soldiers' aptitude scores explained about 25% of the variability in their performance both immediately after training and three weeks later, an individual's aptitude score did not predict how much one's performance would decay over those three weeks.…”
Section: ^ Aptitudementioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, in an Army study of 13 basic training tasks (see Figure 9), high-aptitude soldiers out-performed lowaptitude soldiers both at the end of basic training and six weeks later; but the performance differences between the high and low aptitude soldiers on the six-week test were the same as at the end of basic training. 21 In a similar ARI study of knowledge and skill among radio operators 45 , although ASVAB soldiers' aptitude scores explained about 25% of the variability in their performance both immediately after training and three weeks later, an individual's aptitude score did not predict how much one's performance would decay over those three weeks.…”
Section: ^ Aptitudementioning
confidence: 95%
“…A study of Army basic combat skills showed an average loss of as little as 5 percent after 6 weeks for some tasks (e.g., first aid for shock) and as great as 52 percent for others (e.g., clearing an M16 rifle). 21 Figure 5 shows the set of curves that performance would be expected to follow. Each curve represents a different procedural task.…”
Section: Continuous Execution Versus Discrete Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies of CPR training have varied widely in quality and methodology. Groups studied range from medical staff and students through to the lay public and school pupils with sample sizes ranging from 18 to nearly 1000 (Alvarez & Cobb, 1975;Vineberg, 1975;McManus & Davin, 1976;Skelton & McSwain, 1977;Frazier & Cannon, 1978;McSwain et al ~ 1979).…”
Section: Research Into Cpr Skill Retention and Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All-hough data are lacking with respect to the maintenance of Army job-relevant procedures, data on the maintenance of basic combat training skills (83,141), the preparation and firing of a Nike-Hercules missile (54,55), and gunnery proficiency in a combat air force (World War II) (114) support the contention that procedural proficiency cannot be maintained in the absence of regular practice.…”
Section: -)mentioning
confidence: 99%