2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the thermal conductivity of granular silica materials for VIPs at different levels of gaseous pressure and external loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. A1, the new analytical model results for m = 10 and 15 are also compared to a FEM simulation with COMSOL Multiphysics® for the TPS 19 heat conduction problem ( Fig. 1(e, f)) using sensor with finite-width and zero thickness at z = 0 plane in a large sample domain.…”
Section: Traditional Theory: Infinitesimal Ring Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Fig. A1, the new analytical model results for m = 10 and 15 are also compared to a FEM simulation with COMSOL Multiphysics® for the TPS 19 heat conduction problem ( Fig. 1(e, f)) using sensor with finite-width and zero thickness at z = 0 plane in a large sample domain.…”
Section: Traditional Theory: Infinitesimal Ring Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] For such sample materials, it has been shown that the k measured by the hot disk TPS method with a standard commercial sensor with polyimide (Kapton) as the insulation layer can be 20%-50% higher than the results from the steady-state methods. 18,19 For aerogel samples, there is also a report on the discrepancy in the k result obtained with TPS measurements using different types of sensors insulated with mica and polyimide, where the former type showed a result 54% higher than the later for the same sample. 20 Error in the TPS measurement [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] comes from two sources: (1) uncertainty in the experimental data and the selection of time interval for analysis, and (2) deviation of the original idealized analytical heat transfer model 3,32 from the practical measurement scenario.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in each case the increase in thickness in the stage III was much less than the decrease in the stage I. As the structures of pores and HCMs were collapsed due to the compression force of vacuum in the stage I, the thickness of the VIPs were not fully recovered to the original value, upon the breakage of vacuum in the stage III [35,36]. Fig.…”
Section: Compression (ω) and Rebound Ratio (η)mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To ensure the thermal insulation performance of the VIP over a long time, it is very important to maintain the stability of the vacuum degree in the VIP. As shown in Figure 3, the sensitivity of different core materials to pressure is different, resulting in great differences in their thermal insulation performance under different vacuum degrees [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%