2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on a benchmark control problem for real-time hybrid simulation with a tracking error-based adaptive compensator combined with a supplementary proportional-integral-derivative controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to this benchmark problem, various compensation methods were proposed. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Fermandois 29 applied a feedback regulator to model-based compensation (MBC) approach to improve its robustness for undesired disturbance and sensor noise. Najafi and Spencer 31 introduced an adaptive model reference control method for actuator tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In response to this benchmark problem, various compensation methods were proposed. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Fermandois 29 applied a feedback regulator to model-based compensation (MBC) approach to improve its robustness for undesired disturbance and sensor noise. Najafi and Spencer 31 introduced an adaptive model reference control method for actuator tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Silva et al 28 proposed a benchmark problem for RTHS of a three‐story steel frame. In response to this benchmark problem, various compensation methods were proposed 29–39 . Fermandois 29 applied a feedback regulator to model‐based compensation (MBC) approach to improve its robustness for undesired disturbance and sensor noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More sophisticated techniques are known as adaptive compensation (Wallace et al, 2005b;Bonnet et al, 2007), where the control parameters are adjusted during the RTHS to improve synchronization. Meanwhile, methods such as Tao and Mercan (2019) or Xu W. et al (2019) are based on a frequency domain analysis to adjust parameters of a first-order transfer function. Other methods like Chae et al (2013) or Palacio-Betancur and Gutierrez Soto (2019) estimate the plant through Taylor series expansion and adjust the parameters in the time domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of these issues have been examined in isolation and thus, RTHS has been a subject for continuous development over the past two decades. For instance, researchers have improved the accuracy and stability of interface condition enforcement, see ( Gao et al, 2013 ; Ou et al, 2015 ; Palacio-Betancur and Gutierrez Soto, 2019 ; Tao and Mercan, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2019 ; Xu D. et al, 2019 ). Further, Chae et al (2013) , Chen et al (2015) , Maghareh et al (2020) , and Condori et al (2020) developed adaptive actuator compensation schemes to achieve improved control of servo-hydraulic systems with non-linearities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%