A Study on Instructional Humor: How Much Humor Is Used in Presentations?

Abstract

Humor is applied in pedagogy to create a positive learning environment. Recent research focuses on the theories, effects, individual differences, and qualitative aspects of humor for instruction. However, there is a lack of studies focusing on quantitative features. Therefore, this research explored the quantitative characteristics of instructional humor in a naturalistic setting and applied techniques from natural language processing (NLP). This paper describes the results of two studies. The first study focused on instructional humor frequency and the placement of humor, while the linguistic features of instructional humor and non-instructional humor were compared in the second study. Two corpora were used in this research: TED Talks and user-submitted jokes from “stupidstuff.org” The results found that educators used humor 12.92 times for popular talks, while less popular talks only had 3.92 times. Humor is also more commonly placed during the first parts of the talk and lessens toward the end. There were also significant differences between the linguistic features of instructional and non-instructional humor in terms of readability scores and sentiment. These results provide a substantial update on quantitative instructional humor research and help educators understand how to use humor in the classroom in terms of quantitative and linguistic features.

Installation humor: a resistive social practice identified in the engineering workplace

“…Humor has been primarily studied through three theoretical lenses, namely theories of (1) relief (as an emotional energy release response), (2) superiority (self-enhancement, increased self-esteem) and ( 3) incongruity (laughter caused by an unexpected event or answer) (Martin and Ford, 2018, p. 34). Humor has been regarded as a conceptual framework for reactionary understandings of structured organizational relationships (Lyttle, 2007;Huber, 2022;Shoda and Yamanaka, 2022); for example, mental and emotional tensions during work and work life may be navigated through the social practice of interactive humor (Nijholt, 2016) for a beneficial outcome (Lyttle, 2007).…”

“…These forms of humor are expressed through playfulness and may present, for example, as displayed cartoons (Lyttle, 2007), pranks (Holmila et al, 2007;Bender, 2011), teasing (Fine and De Soucey, 2005), jokes (Lyttle, 2007), inside jokes (Fine and De Soucey, 2005), sarcasm (Tripathy, 2018) or other types of humor aimed at producing responsive laughter (Fine and De Soucey, 2005;Lyttle, 2007;Tripathy, 2018) with no offensive intent (Graefer et al, 2018). Humor has also been investigated as a non-technical competency in other forms of powerrelated social interactions, such as teacher-learner interactions (Nordstrom and Korpelainen, 2011;Berge, 2017;Shoda and Yamanaka, 2022).…”

Humor Use in Speech and Language Therapy in Romania

“…Torok et al (2004) consider that appropriate use of humor can enhance retention, increase learning, improve problem solving, relieve stress, reduce test anxiety, and increase perceptions of faculty credibility. Data about the humor quality during instructional and non-instructional presentation as well as about the distribution of humoristic aspects during presentations and the language engaged in order to express humor are other important aspects to be discussed and to be taken into consideration (Shoda & Yamanaka, 2021). Sambrani et al (2014) conducted a study where 56 8 th grade Indian students were involved.…”

Javanese Silly Gags on Daily Communication on Social Media: Pragmatic Meanings and Functions Approach

“…Whether enjoying physical humor or witty jokes, people find humor in cultural differences, absurd situations, and misunderstandings (Chernobrov, 2022;H. Shin et al, 2023;Shoda & Yamanaka, 2022;Kartika et al, 2023).…”