2009 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icicta.2009.575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on Reaction Time Distribution of Group Drivers at Car-Following

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quick physical reaction to an external stimulus, or short HRT, can also be considered as a human physical performance indicator of well-being. In some professions such as airline pilots, athletes and drivers [ 2 , 3 ], short HRT is critical to performance. HRT is usually obtained from three different tests [ 4 ] – simple [ 5 ], recognition [ 6 ] and choice [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quick physical reaction to an external stimulus, or short HRT, can also be considered as a human physical performance indicator of well-being. In some professions such as airline pilots, athletes and drivers [ 2 , 3 ], short HRT is critical to performance. HRT is usually obtained from three different tests [ 4 ] – simple [ 5 ], recognition [ 6 ] and choice [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we can infer the confidence interval of the participants’ reaction time. In this study, reaction times seem to be longer [47, 48]. Two possible reasons are as follows: firstly, the simulated environment may make the participant less vigilant than in the real world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I lists the requirements for the user cases of safety services [16] [17]. The minimum frequency of periodic messages of the safety service varies from 1 Hz to 10 Hz, and the reaction time of most drivers ranges from 0.6 s to 1.4 s [18]. Thus, it is reasonable to restrict the maximum latency time to be no more than 100 ms. For example, the maximum latency of pre-crash sensing warning is 50 ms.…”
Section: A Safety Related Service and Use Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%