1993
DOI: 10.2208/jscej.1993.479_71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on Similarity Law of Distorted River Models With Alternate Bar Beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model scales, subscript R, refer to the ratio of prototype to model conditions. Because of laboratory space constraints, we adopted the distorted model channel experimental method [10], with a difference in the ratio of horizontal and vertical scale between the prototype and the model. This method focuses on the reproducibility of bed forms during the examination of moving riverbed fluctuations.…”
Section: Experimental Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Model scales, subscript R, refer to the ratio of prototype to model conditions. Because of laboratory space constraints, we adopted the distorted model channel experimental method [10], with a difference in the ratio of horizontal and vertical scale between the prototype and the model. This method focuses on the reproducibility of bed forms during the examination of moving riverbed fluctuations.…”
Section: Experimental Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to laboratory space constrains, the horizontal scale ration of the channel width B is set to B R = B P /B M = 200 and a grain diameter of d M = 0.59 (mm) is used due to the requirement not to form sand ripples on the bed waves; this meets the similarity conditions shown in Table 1. Moreover, the scale ratio of the flow rate Q R is as indicated in the following equation [10].…”
Section: Experimental Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(29)-(35), which ware obtained according to Eqs. (27), (28), (7), (8) and the Manning-Strickler formula (U/u * = 6.0 (h/d) 1/6 ), are also listed in Table 1 (detailed information about the derivation refers to Uchijima, K. and H. Hayakawa, 1993).…”
Section: Eqations and Their Solutions For Similarity Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, it is necessary for a distorted river model with a movable bed to develop new similarity laws that are easy to use and do not have the drawbacks mentioned above. As a result, Uchijima derived similarity laws by assuming that the values of the dual dimensionless parameters of Sukegawa's regime-criterion diagram for the bars (Sukegawa, 1972) of the model were equal to those of a prototype (Uchijima et al, 1993;Uchijima, 1995). Furthermore, satisfactory verification results were obtained by performing several distorted-model experiments (Uchijima et al, 1995(Uchijima et al, , 1997.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, it is necessary for a distorted river model with a movable bed to develop new similarity laws, which are easy to use and do not have the drawbacks mentioned above. Then Uchijima derived similarity laws by assuming that the values of the dual dimensionless parameters of Sukegawa's regime-criterion diagram for the bars (Sukegawa, 1972) of the model are equal to those of a prototype (Uchijima et al, 1993, Uchijima, 1995. Furthermore, satisfactory verification results were obtained by performing several distorted model experiments (Uchijima et al, 1995(Uchijima et al, , 1997.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%