2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2004.06.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on the electrical conductivity of multi-walled carbon nanotube aqueous solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The other relevant studies of CNT-based colloids did not present results for e 0 [Liu et al, 2004;Lisunova et al, 2006;Glover et al, 2008] so there is no basis for comparison of our results. However, SWCNTs are known to have high e 0 so their affect on increasing the e 0 of the colloid was expected.…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other relevant studies of CNT-based colloids did not present results for e 0 [Liu et al, 2004;Lisunova et al, 2006;Glover et al, 2008] so there is no basis for comparison of our results. However, SWCNTs are known to have high e 0 so their affect on increasing the e 0 of the colloid was expected.…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…For example, the conductivity of functional sulfonated SWCNTs were evaluated in 50% deionized water/50% ethylene glycol (s ¼ 10 À3 S/m) from 100 kHz to 1 MHz [Glover et al, 2008]. The conductivity of multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) were evaluated in chloroform (s ¼ 2.67 Â 10 À8 S/m) and toluene (s ¼ 3.4 Â 10 À10 S/m) at DC [Liu et al, 2004], and in 0.01 M KCl (s ¼ 0.12 S/m) with Triton X-305 surfactant at 1 kHz [Lisunova et al, 2006]. The relative effect of conductive nanoparticles on the aggregate colloid s (and relative SAR) is predicted to be significantly larger in solvents that are intrinsically poor conductors like deionized water (s $ 10 À5 S/m) or organic solvents, compared to biologically compatible electrolyte solutions (s > 0.2 S/m).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the documented oriented nanofibers (Ra et al, 2005), herein, the deposited nanofibers on the collector were isotropic, as shown in Figure 1b. However, MWCNTs could align along the single nanofiber, not only due to the ejecting stress (Cooper et al, 2002;Haggenmueller et al, 2000) at the spinneret, but also the present high electric field (Liu et al, 2004;Takahashi et al, 2006). Typical SEM images in Figure 2a-d show the surface morphologies of the electrospun nanofiber mesh with different MWCNTs concentrations.…”
Section: Storage Stabilities Of the Free And Immobilized Catalasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carboxyl groups on the etched MWCNTs surfaces could interact with DMF and ÀCOOH (through hydrogen bond) in PANCAA, which increased the solution viscosity (Fig. 2f), and the enhanced electrical conductivity was ascribed to MWCNTs addition to the polymer solution (Liu et al, 2004). The competition between the solution viscosity and the electrical conductivity resulted in the biggest average diameter of the nanofiber.…”
Section: Storage Stabilities Of the Free And Immobilized Catalasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation