2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on the evaluation of problem posing skills in terms of academic success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommendations: students and tutors should be trained on how to questionAkay and Boz (2009)Mathematics educationClassroomThe experimental group was demonstrated with 28 different PP activities41 prospective science teachersIt reaffirmed that PP (by teachers) should be used in mathematics classesToluk-Uçar (2009)Mathematics educationClassroomClassroom PP exercise-subjects posed problems on given symbolic situations95 pre-service primary school teachersPP had a positive impact on pre-service teachers’ understanding of fractions as well as on their views about what it means to know mathematicsKar et al (2010)Mathematics educationLab experimentProspective teachers (PT) PP-PS tests. Each item in the PS test included patterns in PP tests76 (PTs)There was a significant relation between PP and PSLavy and Shriki (2010)Mathematics educationComputer-based environmentSubjects were given guidelines using the “what-if-not?” strategy25 PTsPTs perceived that engaging in the inquiry-based activity enhanced both their mathematical and meta-mathematical knowledgeCankoy and Darbaz (2010)Mathematics educationClassroom with PP as an instructional strategyExperimental group has followed a PP-based PS instruction for 10 weeks, whereas the control group has followed a traditional PS instruction53 third-grade students from an urban elementary schoolExperimental group was better than the control group students in terms of understanding the problem even after a 3-month gap between posttest and interventionÇildir and Sezen (2011)Physics educationLab experimentStudy sheets which consisted of 8 PP questions9 prospective physics teachers-sophomoresHigh scorers have higher PP skills than those with medium or lower scores; however, no significant difference was observed between those with medium or lower scores in terms of their PS skillsBeal and Cohen (2012)Mathematics and ScienceOnline collaborative learning environment (Teach Ourselves)Pose problems over web-based content-authoring and sharing systemMiddle school students, N  = 224Evidence—students were able to generate problems on the online platformSengül and Katranci (2012)Mathematics educationLab experimentPP related to the “Sets” topic and then qualitative study of their activity56 sophomore prospective primary mathematics teachersSubjects had the most difficulty in adjusting the level of the problem posed to the level of the primary educationArikan et al (2012)GeneralLab experiment15 PP-ba...…”
Section: Motivation and Related Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recommendations: students and tutors should be trained on how to questionAkay and Boz (2009)Mathematics educationClassroomThe experimental group was demonstrated with 28 different PP activities41 prospective science teachersIt reaffirmed that PP (by teachers) should be used in mathematics classesToluk-Uçar (2009)Mathematics educationClassroomClassroom PP exercise-subjects posed problems on given symbolic situations95 pre-service primary school teachersPP had a positive impact on pre-service teachers’ understanding of fractions as well as on their views about what it means to know mathematicsKar et al (2010)Mathematics educationLab experimentProspective teachers (PT) PP-PS tests. Each item in the PS test included patterns in PP tests76 (PTs)There was a significant relation between PP and PSLavy and Shriki (2010)Mathematics educationComputer-based environmentSubjects were given guidelines using the “what-if-not?” strategy25 PTsPTs perceived that engaging in the inquiry-based activity enhanced both their mathematical and meta-mathematical knowledgeCankoy and Darbaz (2010)Mathematics educationClassroom with PP as an instructional strategyExperimental group has followed a PP-based PS instruction for 10 weeks, whereas the control group has followed a traditional PS instruction53 third-grade students from an urban elementary schoolExperimental group was better than the control group students in terms of understanding the problem even after a 3-month gap between posttest and interventionÇildir and Sezen (2011)Physics educationLab experimentStudy sheets which consisted of 8 PP questions9 prospective physics teachers-sophomoresHigh scorers have higher PP skills than those with medium or lower scores; however, no significant difference was observed between those with medium or lower scores in terms of their PS skillsBeal and Cohen (2012)Mathematics and ScienceOnline collaborative learning environment (Teach Ourselves)Pose problems over web-based content-authoring and sharing systemMiddle school students, N  = 224Evidence—students were able to generate problems on the online platformSengül and Katranci (2012)Mathematics educationLab experimentPP related to the “Sets” topic and then qualitative study of their activity56 sophomore prospective primary mathematics teachersSubjects had the most difficulty in adjusting the level of the problem posed to the level of the primary educationArikan et al (2012)GeneralLab experiment15 PP-ba...…”
Section: Motivation and Related Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toluk-Uçar (2009), Lavy and Shriki (2010), Silver (1997), Cankoy and Darbaz (2010), Gubareva (1992), English (1998), and Pintér (2012) demonstrate how PP can be used as an instructional strategy. Çildir and Sezen (2011) and Silver et al (1996) talk about the relation between problem posing and problem solving. As far as our exploration of PP as an instructional strategy is concerned, the notion of PP that we are interested in is PP involving the generation of new questions around a given situation, wherein students use the PP activity as a way to unfold new knowledge, around conceptually related seed knowledge, in any given domain.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When posing problems, too depend on textbook participants failed to come up with the required mathematical thinking and reasoning skills. Still, many participants did not use creativity when posing problems [23]. Lack of knowing cognitive level, curriculum knowledge, and posing studies [5].…”
Section: How To Develop Mathematical Problem Posingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provide problem posing activities would make prospective teachers more active and think more analytically. The lack of problem posing can affect academic success in a negative way [23,24]. 6.…”
Section: How To Develop Mathematical Problem Posingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students have difficulty adjusting the difficulty level of the problem (Şengül, 2012). If the teacher provides problem-posing activities to students during class learning, students become active in class and allow them to think analytically (Cildir, 2011). It is believed that problem posing is a learning model where the more experienced, the better it will be for student learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%