2020
DOI: 10.9798/kosham.2020.20.1.257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Recognition of the Use of Evacuation Equipment and Safety Experience Education

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the degree of recognition of evacuation equipment as well as facilitate the improvement of education. Over 300 specialist groups related to work and education nationwide were selected, without selecting the scope of the region; a questionnaire survey on evacuation equipmentwas conducted. The collected data were analyzed statisticallyusing the SPSS 20.0 program. The questionnaire consisted of general characteristics, knowledge level of evacuation equipment, degree of experience, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results of the survey, the proportion of using descending lifelines was approximately 77%; moreover, descending lifelines were used because their installation is simple and they can be installed in a small area. The necessity of evaluation equipment was emphasized in several previous studies [6][7][8][9][10], but the performance of evacuation equipment was quantitatively analyzed through mock-up experiments in only a few studies. Thus, in this study, mock-up experiments were performed to quantitatively analyze the performance of a descending lifeline, which is most commonly used in Korea, and elevating evacuation equipment, which is evaluated to be highly suitable for high-rise buildings.…”
Section: Problems With Installation Standards For Evacuation Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results of the survey, the proportion of using descending lifelines was approximately 77%; moreover, descending lifelines were used because their installation is simple and they can be installed in a small area. The necessity of evaluation equipment was emphasized in several previous studies [6][7][8][9][10], but the performance of evacuation equipment was quantitatively analyzed through mock-up experiments in only a few studies. Thus, in this study, mock-up experiments were performed to quantitatively analyze the performance of a descending lifeline, which is most commonly used in Korea, and elevating evacuation equipment, which is evaluated to be highly suitable for high-rise buildings.…”
Section: Problems With Installation Standards For Evacuation Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%