A study on the tolerance level of farmers toward human-wildlife conflict in the forest buffer zones of Tamil Nadu

Abstract

Aim:The aim of this work was to study the tolerance level of farmers toward different human-wildlife conflict (HWC) situations.Materials and Methods:This study was conducted in 24 villages of nine blocks from Kancheepuram, Coimbatore, Erode, and Krishnagiri districts of Tamil Nadu by personally interviewing 240 farmers affected with four different HWC situations such as human-elephant conflict (HEC), human-wild pig conflict (HPC), human-gaur conflict (HGC), and human-monkey conflict (HMC). A scale developed for this purpose was used to find out the tolerance level of the farmers.Results:In general, the majority (61.70%) of the farmers had medium level of tolerance toward HWC, whereas 25.40% and 12.90% belonged to a high and low category, respectively. The mean tolerance level of the farmer’s encountering HMC is low (8.77) among the other three wild animal conflicts. In tackling HWC, the majority (55.00%) of the HEC farmers drove the elephant once it entered into their farmland. In the HPC, more than three-fourths of the respondents drove away the wild pig once they were found in farmlands. With regard to the HMC, a less number of them (1.70%) drove the monkey away if monkeys were spotted in their village. With regard to HGC, 95.00% of the respondents frightened the gaurs if their family members were threatened by gaurs.Conclusion:The present study suggests that that majority of the farmers had medium level of tolerance toward HWC. The tolerance level of the HMC farmers was lower than other three HWC affected farmers. This study emphasizes the need for necessary training to tackle the problem in an effective manner for wild animal conservation.

Human-Wildlife Conflicts patterns and underlying impacts: A systematic review

“…They are distributed across all the states of India. The population of feral pigs is increasing as they are proli c breeders and breed throughout the year (Senthilkumar, 2016). Crop damage is the most severe issue reported by human-wildpig con ict studies, and it mainly occurs in areas adjoining the forest boundary (Milda et al, 2022).…”

Promoting harmony between local people and wild animals around the Humbo Community Managed Forest area, southern Ethiopia

“…This finding is similar to the study done by Shanko et al (2021) in the Belo-Bira Forest, Dawro Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Senthilkumar et al (2016) and Gobosho et al (2015) noted that crop damage is progressively known to cause conflict between humans and crop raiders, particularly across the African continent. Crop-raiding by wildlife has a significant impact on rural people's livelihoods by causing food insecurity (Angela et al, 2014;Mojo et al, 2014;Tesfaye, 2015).…”

Combining payment for crop damages and reward for productivity to address wildlife conflict

“…Owing to the background belief systems and cultural practices, Indian forest dwellers and farmers are traditionally and generally tolerant of wildlife, a perception that started changing with the establishment of wildlife reserves (Rangarajan, 2001). Nevertheless, moderate to high levels of tolerance of wild animals is still prevalent in India (e.g., Bhatia et al., 2016; Hall, 2011; Senthilkumar et al., 2016). However, it is difficult to sustain heavy losses to crops and other livelihood options, and this creates resentment.…”