2015
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2014.2339638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Subcutaneous Biochip for Remote Monitoring of Human Metabolism: Packaging and Biocompatibility Assessment

Abstract: Abstract-This paper represents the extended version of the conference paper "Developing highly-integrated subcutaneous biochips for remote monitoring of human metabolism" presented at the IEEE Sensors Conference 2012, and presents data on assembly, packaging and short term in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility evaluation of a fully implantable biosensor array. The device was realized integrating three building blocks: 1) a multielectrode platform; 2) an inductive coil; and 3) an integrated circuit. The entire … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we compare three different packaging realized with different shape, size and with different materials. However, they all share some common features: (i) MWCNTs were entrapped in a chitosan matrix to prevent the potential toxicity due to their nano-particle nature; (ii) to prevent the corrosion of electronic components due to the contact with biologic fluids, and to prevent the leaking of potential hazardous substances, a coating of Parylene C was deposited [8,9]; (iii) a biocompatible packaging was realized, as, for an implantable sensor, it is essential for a correct wound healing, and for ensuring prolonged sensor functionality. The main differences between the three systems are: (i) the shape of the device; (ii) the shape of the packaging in silicone; (iii) the composition of the membrane that covers the sensors; (iv) the composition of the external packaging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper we compare three different packaging realized with different shape, size and with different materials. However, they all share some common features: (i) MWCNTs were entrapped in a chitosan matrix to prevent the potential toxicity due to their nano-particle nature; (ii) to prevent the corrosion of electronic components due to the contact with biologic fluids, and to prevent the leaking of potential hazardous substances, a coating of Parylene C was deposited [8,9]; (iii) a biocompatible packaging was realized, as, for an implantable sensor, it is essential for a correct wound healing, and for ensuring prolonged sensor functionality. The main differences between the three systems are: (i) the shape of the device; (ii) the shape of the packaging in silicone; (iii) the composition of the membrane that covers the sensors; (iv) the composition of the external packaging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, suggest that after 30 days the host seems to accept the insert. Comparison with the commercial chip, level of neutrophil, and biocompatibility tests with cell cultures for the first version of the packaging have been published in [8]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An example and prototype of a future implantable sensing system for monitoring human metabolism [3] is shown in Figure 1. Examples of molecules that can be monitored include glucose, lactate, cholesterol, ATP, glutamate and others.…”
Section: Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An electronic patch on the body produces the inductive field to power the implant, receives the backscattered data, and transmits it to a base station using the Bluetooth standard. [3].…”
Section: Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%