1941
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1941.00021962003300010005x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Summary of Linkage Studies in Barley1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1944
1944
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3• VtVd genotype.-Heterozygous VtVd plants are very much like the two genotypes above and may be considered almost identical with the Vtv type. 4• Vv genotype.-More variations in fertility occur in this genotype than in any of those already described. This heterozygous genotype in the presence of ii is known as a 1ow fertility intermediate.…”
Section: Description Of Heterozygous V Vd V Vt Genotypes In Relatimentioning
confidence: 65%
“…3• VtVd genotype.-Heterozygous VtVd plants are very much like the two genotypes above and may be considered almost identical with the Vtv type. 4• Vv genotype.-More variations in fertility occur in this genotype than in any of those already described. This heterozygous genotype in the presence of ii is known as a 1ow fertility intermediate.…”
Section: Description Of Heterozygous V Vd V Vt Genotypes In Relatimentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These varieties are 6-rowed, spring types. The plant characters studied together with their gene symbols ( 7) were covered vs. naked qryopsis N n, hooded vs. awned Kk, long-vs: shoot-haired rachilla Ss, resistance vs. susceptibility to stem rust Tt, normal plant stature vs. brachytic Br br, and resistance vs. susceptibility to U. hordei U h u.h. The genetic constitutions were nn, kk, SS, tt, br br, Uh Uh for Brachytic; NN, kk, ss, TT, Br Br, uh uh for Chevron; and NN, KK, ss, tt, Br Br, 11h 11h for Colsess.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chevron .... 13.4 72. 7 10.2 * Differences in classifiable plants significant at 5% level. ** Differences in classifiable plants significant at I% level.…”
Section: Influence Of Smut On Emergence and Standmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barley has been the subject of intensive genetic studies due to its many contrasting traits, its diploid status and low chromosome number (n = 7), its autogamous reproduction, its annual habit, and the ease with which cultivated and some wild forms can be hybridized (Cook, 1962), The literature on inheritance of barley is very extensive, but I will review only those papers that have a direct bearing on the traits involved in my study. Robertson et al (1941Robertson et al ( ,1947, Smith (1951), and Nilan Griffee (1925) found that maturity was controlled by a single factor pair and earliness was dominant. Maturity was strongly linked to a locus that controlled reaction to Helminthosporium sativum.…”
Section: Literature Review Inheritance Studies In Barleymentioning
confidence: 99%