2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.07.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A superstructure-based electrochemical assay for signal-amplified detection of DNA methyltransferase activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A LOD of 3.5 × 10 –3 U mL –1 is obtained based on the control group plus three times standard deviation. The sensitivity of the proposed ECL biosensor is much higher than those of the reported methods (Table S1), with 7.1-fold higher than that of electrochemical assay, 8.6-fold higher than that of electrochemiluminescence assay, 10-fold higher than that of photoelectrochemical assay, 40-fold higher than that of fluorescence assay, , and 714.3-fold higher than that of colorimetric assay . The high sensitivity of this biosensor can be ascribed to (1) the strong ECL emission of the Ag-MOG induced by target M.SssI MTase, (2) the high quenching efficiency of Fc in the absence of target M.SssI MTase, and (3) the efficient supramolecular host–guest recognition reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A LOD of 3.5 × 10 –3 U mL –1 is obtained based on the control group plus three times standard deviation. The sensitivity of the proposed ECL biosensor is much higher than those of the reported methods (Table S1), with 7.1-fold higher than that of electrochemical assay, 8.6-fold higher than that of electrochemiluminescence assay, 10-fold higher than that of photoelectrochemical assay, 40-fold higher than that of fluorescence assay, , and 714.3-fold higher than that of colorimetric assay . The high sensitivity of this biosensor can be ascribed to (1) the strong ECL emission of the Ag-MOG induced by target M.SssI MTase, (2) the high quenching efficiency of Fc in the absence of target M.SssI MTase, and (3) the efficient supramolecular host–guest recognition reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PNAs are DNA mimics in which the bases are attached to a neutral N-(2-aminoethyl)-glycine pseudopeptide backbone, and LNAs are nucleic acid analogues in which the ribose ring is "locked" by a methylene bridge that shows increased thermal stability [4]. Other capture probes used are chemically modified at one of the oligonucleotide ends, and usually, biotin, thiol, or amine residues are aggregated, biotin and thiol being the most used chemical modifications [7][8][9][37][38][39][40]. Moreover, the surface chemistry used in this study enabled the immobilization of cDNA, which allowed developing a biosensor for gene expression determination from children with obesity.…”
Section: Real-time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid this complexity, in the current study, weexplored whether simply monitoring the total charge generated by the electrostatically-attached RuHex onto the adsorbed DNA could report on the level of DNA methylation present in samples, where generated total redox charge is the function of adsorbed DNA sequences on the electrode surface [26][27][28][29]. Since in this "signal-on" approach,the charge of the RuHex complex is quantitatively reflecting the amount of the adsorbed DNA at the electrode surface [30], the electrochemical signal generated by the chronocoulometric (CC) interrogation of DNAbound RuHex will give the level of methylation present in the amplified samples.It is also important to note that unlike RuHexbased conventional methods [30], the current method detects DNA methylation by simply monitoring the adsorbed target DNA on an unmodified SPE-Au electrode.…”
Section: Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…faster. Fourth, the detection step of our proposed assay can take only ten min in total (excluding bisulfite treatment and asymmetric PCR steps) to achieve electrochemical readout, which is considerably faster than many recent electrochemical DNA methylation assays [13,29,40].…”
Section: Gene Specific Methylation Detection and Validation In Cell Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation