2008
DOI: 10.1515/9781400841189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Computational Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have presented an approach to the real-space Schrödinger equation via the Hamiltonian matrix in momentum-space that is obtained after a suitable discretization. 6 This method does not suffer from the instability associated with discretization of the real-space localized (an infinite quantum well or a simple harmonic oscillator) cannot be studied using our approach because the Fourier transform is ill-defined. However, as we have discussed in Sec.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have presented an approach to the real-space Schrödinger equation via the Hamiltonian matrix in momentum-space that is obtained after a suitable discretization. 6 This method does not suffer from the instability associated with discretization of the real-space localized (an infinite quantum well or a simple harmonic oscillator) cannot be studied using our approach because the Fourier transform is ill-defined. However, as we have discussed in Sec.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…III we discuss the generalization of our approach to the Schrödinger equation in higher dimensions. 6 We conclude in Sec. IV with a discussion and suggested problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where u(r) = rR nl (r), has been considered an important teaching tool in this Journal 1 and a standard subject in Koonin's early computational physics text. 2 However, in recent years, this topic is not discussed in most computational physics texts, [3][4][5][6][7] or only alluded to briefly. 5 Perhaps, this is related to the difficulty of implementing the conventional shooting or matching method 1,3-7 of solving the eigenvalue problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simplification follows from two key ideas: 1) The eigenvalue E is usually determined by requiring the eigenfunction to satisfy certain boundary conditions. The adjustment of the eigenvalue by shooting or matching the eigenfunction [3][4][5][6][7] to satisfy the boundary condition is a tedious iterative process. In this work, we completely by-pass this adjustment process by sweeping through all values of E to a desire accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%