A survey of evaluation techniques used in augmented reality studies

Understanding the everyday use of head-worn computers

“…Google Glass is the most well-known example of a head-worn computer, but there are other commercially available examples such as Recon Snow While head-worn displays and wearable computers are well established research topics and by many researchers in different areas [3]- [5], many of those studies concentrated on perceptual issues [6]- [8] and on work-related tasks with long and potentially complex interactions [9]- [11]. Until recently, only a few studies addressed user related issues: According to Dünser et al [12], in a survey ranging from 1992-2007, only 10% of augmented reality researchers involved users in the study; additionally, Swan et al [13] proposed a similar survey and found that out of 1104 articles 3% addressed HCI issues and 2% involved user-tasks. Consequently, there has been little in-depth investigation on the everyday use of HWCs.…”

“…Fig. 4 shows the frequency rate, ease of use rate, desire of use rate 12 as well as the Medians for each interaction technique.…”

“…However, diary study participants mentioned that extending eye gestures could provide more hands-free interaction, if there is a possibility to overcome their limitations. 12 Frequency rate (5 = Always, 4 = Often), Ease of use rate (5 = Very easy, 4 = Easy) and Desire of use rate (5 = Very desirable, 4 = Desirable). All positive answers aggregated.…”

Results of an evaluation of augmented reality mobile development frameworks for addresses in augmented reality

“…Augmented reality enhances our understanding and interaction with the physical world [3][4]. Augmented reality has proven to be useful in a variety of application fields, such as medicine [2,[5][6], education [7][8], navigation [9][10] and planning [11][12].…”

Research on the Communication Effect of Augmented Reality Technology in Electronic Publications among Youth—A Case Study of “Augmented Reality Interactive Science Reading”

“…At present, domestic and international enhancement of real electronic publications mainly concentrated in product research (Hwang et al, 2016;Lai et al, 2015) and product effects (Phillips, 1991;Rothenberg, 2000). Dünser et al (2008) identified all papers which include A Revaluations we reviewed research publications between the years 1993 and 2007 from online databases of selected scientific publishers. Lai et al (2015) uses the technology with iPad mobile device to display 3D models, 3D animations, video splaying, websites and web server connectivity for children education.…”