2016
DOI: 10.1111/njb.01028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of ontogeny pericarp features as contribution to the infratribal characterization of Myrteae (Myrtaceae)

Abstract: With the aim of correlating the pericarp structure with current phylogenies of Myrteae, this study describes the ontogeny in five species included in five out of the six South American clades of the tribe. In these taxa, the outer and inner ovarian epidermis gives rise to the exocarp and the endocarp, respectively, both with 1 layer. In the mesocarp, derived from the ovarian mesophyll, secretory cavities are arranged into a circle just below the exocarp and near the endocarp in Campomanesia adamantium; only be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reproductive isolation and speciation may be achieved by other means in Myrcia . Fruits in Myrcia are always fleshy berries and are also not highly variable in shape (Lucas et al ., ), but changes in epidermal and anatomical composition (Galan et al ., ) promote variation in colour and texture, subtly changing display and dispersal mode. These fruits are dispersed by a diversity of animals, mainly birds and mammals (Gressler et al ., ; Staggemeier et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproductive isolation and speciation may be achieved by other means in Myrcia . Fruits in Myrcia are always fleshy berries and are also not highly variable in shape (Lucas et al ., ), but changes in epidermal and anatomical composition (Galan et al ., ) promote variation in colour and texture, subtly changing display and dispersal mode. These fruits are dispersed by a diversity of animals, mainly birds and mammals (Gressler et al ., ; Staggemeier et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%