2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2222-1808(14)60620-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of rabies virus antibodies in confined, hunting and roaming dogs in Ogun and Oyo States, Southwestern Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The outbreak in pigs was due to the pigs been bitten by a stray rabid dog which came from adjoining communities for hunting and other purposes, three of the four bitten showed clinical signs and died of the disease. This further elucidated the fact that stray and hunting dogs are often prone or harbor rabies virus as opinioned by Olugasa et al (2011) and Oluwayelu et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The outbreak in pigs was due to the pigs been bitten by a stray rabid dog which came from adjoining communities for hunting and other purposes, three of the four bitten showed clinical signs and died of the disease. This further elucidated the fact that stray and hunting dogs are often prone or harbor rabies virus as opinioned by Olugasa et al (2011) and Oluwayelu et al (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…1 , Supplementary Table 4 ). A group of 73 articles corresponding to 142 incidence data was finally selected for this review [ [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [65] , [66] , [67] , [68] , [69] , [70] , [71] , [72] , [73] , [74] , [75] , [76] , [77] , [78] , [79] , [80] , ...…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…The 15 articles (21 seroprevalence data) in dogs with past exposure ( N = 3577 participants) reported seroprevalence ranging from 0 to 80% with a meta-seroprevalence of 19.8% (95% CI: 13.3–27.3) ( Supplementary Fig. 1 ) [ 19 , 32 , 35 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 64 , [68] , [69] , [70] , [71] , 73 , 74 , 77 , 80 ]. RABV meta-seroprevalence in dogs with evidence of past exposure ranged from 4.9% in wild dogs to 28.4% in unspecified dogs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological staining of Negri bodies is neither as sensitive nor as specific as DFAT and dRIT [ 28 ]. False-positive samples might have been processed, or only submissions from confirmed cases were processed [ [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] ]. Moreover, the Sellers staining method can be laborious, as evident in the number of samples processed before the introduction of DFAT, especially during 2004.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%